Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-21 Thread Adam Langley
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:46:10PM -0700, martin chao wrote: > You people actually believe the constitution gives you > the right to distribute porn and other people's > software. To quote you: "copyrights are a violation of People. There is no point trying to discuss things with someone like th

Re: [freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-21 Thread Greg Wooledge
Glenn McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Any idea which linux mail clients are causing you problems, or what > about the email causes it to be viewed as an attachment ? Usually it's the presence of MIME headers. For example, when a message is PGP signed; the first part of the message is "text

Re: [freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-21 Thread moritz
Don Marti (Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:17:42PM -0700): > begin David McNab quotation of Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 04:17:47PM +1300: > > > Does anyone know of a good Windows email client that can read email sent > > from linux clients without having to open them as attachments? does mutt work with windows

Re: [freenet-chat] Slashdot needs Freenet category with Hops

2001-10-21 Thread Timm Murray
> > Centralization. While it's not so bad if a better machine does a > > little more work, it get's bad when that same machine is getting > > requests from half the network. > > Wouldn't that be more a problem of routing requests than saying it is > horrible if you want your node to have more da

Re: [freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-21 Thread Don Marti
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation of Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 02:45:34PM +0200: > does mutt work with windows The mutt FAQ says someone made it work with Cygwin and put it on Sourceforge along with other un*x-style mail tools. http://sourceforge.net/projects/unixmail-w32/ I haven't tried it.

Re: [freenet-chat] Slashdot needs Freenet category with Hops

2001-10-21 Thread Michael
> If I understand what you're saying, no it can't. Freenet is designed > so that you can't know what is going on in other parts of the network. > A single node might notice that a certian other node tends to pop up a > lot in it's table, and then go out and find a new node with similar > data,

Re: [freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-21 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Guten Tag David McNab, Am 2001-10-21 um 05:17 schriebst du: > Does anyone know of a good Windows email client that can read email sent > from linux clients without having to open them as attachments? Wow, what are there a lot of clowns out there:-) I used a very long time (about a year now) Peg

Re: [freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-21 Thread Ian Clarke
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 09:17:42PM -0700, Don Marti wrote: > > Does anyone know of a good Windows email client that can read email sent > > from linux clients without having to open them as attachments? > > You probably have a problem reading mail from wiseasses, not a problem > reading mail sent

Re: [freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-21 Thread Ian Clarke
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 02:45:34PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Does anyone know of a good Windows email client that can read email sent > > > from linux clients without having to open them as attachments? > > does mutt work with windows Apparently people have compiled mutt on windo

Re: [freenet-chat] Question - Windoze Email Clients

2001-10-21 Thread David McNab
> Eudora does not have that bug. I'm afraid it does - version 5.1 does anyway. Still the same attachments problem. David ___ Chat mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/chat

Re: [freenet-chat] anarchists in america

2001-10-21 Thread David McNab
From: "Adam Langley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:46:10PM -0700, martin chao wrote: > > You people actually believe the constitution gives you > > the right to distribute porn and other people's > > software. To quote you: "copyrights are a violation of > > People. There is