On 4/5/06, Joel Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I could also set up two nodes, one at school and one at home, both
> with the same Frost identity. My initial connections are from school
> but I only use trusted connections at home --- and I can very tightly
> control who gets my home node inf
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 03:31:42AM -0400, Joel Salomon wrote:
>
> If there's a security/anonymity hole in the plan I've laid out, please
> tell me. The alpha darknet is not too early to start thinking about
> realistic connection procedures.
If you trust somebody on Frost, that doesn't automatic
On 4/5/06, Lars Juel Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't see that; you're only giving your IP address to people you've
> > grown to trust -- via an encrypted-to-them message. If there's mutual
> > trust between you and anybody else, in any way, then they can connect
> > your IP to howev
On 4/5/06, Joel Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/06, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem is people on Frost know what you've been doing on the
> > network, and can connect all your illegal libellous remarks with your IP
> > address.
>
> I don't see that; you're on
On 4/4/06, Matthew Toseland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is people on Frost know what you've been doing on the
> network, and can connect all your illegal libellous remarks with your IP
> address.
I don't see that; you're only giving your IP address to people you've
grown to trust -- v
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 01:01:35PM -0400, Joel Salomon wrote:
> On 4/4/06, Joel Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone see a problem with this idea? Are encrypted Frost
> > messages "secure enough" even while the darknet isn't quite dark?
>
> On IRC, Terrasque responded:
> > Horovits,
