I'd actually prefer GM NOT build another Chevelle. They continually
screw up and taint the names of the late great cars. Look at the new
Malibu, jeez what a POC. And a Camaro SS Z28 ? What idiot decided that
was good; undoubtably born well after the Z28 name meant something.
I don't
I THINK BRANDWOOD ON UNIVERSITY. THEY BUILD SAND RAILS OTHER OFF-ROAD
STUFF I'M PRETTY SURE THEY WERE CONSTRUCTING THEIR OWN WHEELS ONCE UPON A
TIME.
JOE BANKS
AZTECH MOLD DIE STEEL
602-257-2300
-ORIGINAL MESSAGE-
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[MAILTO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]ON BEHALF OF SEAN
At 09:51 AM 4/13/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Car
companies think that they are doing something great when they TRY to
bring back a older model. They do not understand what made these cars
great. These new models are all rounded off, the shapes and lines of the
original are not repeated. The frame are
I think someone might have been looking at
the new Pontiac GTO. It is going to be imported from the Holden plant in Australia. It has an LS1
under the hood, RWD, handles great and has 4 seats and 2 doors. And to
boot it doesnt look to bad!
Search on yahoo for it and you should find
some
Hello
I agree with you. But maybe... just maybe, since we have this wonderful
new technology to utilize our communications with, we can all send a message
to the car designers.
Tom
-
To Unsubscribe please visit
http://www.movecars.com/toc/find/index.htm
Kelly Jana Hanna
www.hannawoodworks.com
-
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
humm maybe we could get a pony chevelle
a slightly scale down version but it would have too
be rear wheel drive and all the car makers have gone front wheel drive
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 11:10 AM
Subject: Re:
Were Chevelle people, we can have anything we want to wish for.
Keith
- Original Message -
From: rob boleky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 1:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] New Chevelle?
humm maybe we could get a pony chevelle
a slightly
I agree with what you guys are saying but
it will never happen. The car manufacturers are tooled to build cars a certain
way going back to frames, etc just would be to costly. They also have to
meet all kinds of safety, crash emissions laws now. The new cars "fold on
impact" for a reason,
At 02:45 PM 4/13/2002 -0400, you wrote:
I
agree with what you guys are saying but it will never happen. The car
manufacturers are tooled to build cars a certain way going back to
frames, etc just would be to costly. They also have to meet all kinds of
safety, crash emissions laws now. The new
Be glad that we still can own themthat will eventually go away
as well
Unfortunately you're probably
right.
The politicians bleeding heart
liberals are constantly trying to take away our old cars, our guns our
real freedoms.
Don
Kelly Jana Hannawww.hannawoodworks.com
That would have made sense too, but nope.. my metal one is on the battery
side rusting away...
Rodney.
71 Chevelle
Phoenix, AZ
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 5:59 AM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] (no subject)
i thought
A lot
of guys on the Impala SS list (94-96 list) hate dexcool. The impalas have
a problem with the heater core blocking up thus not throwing any
heat.
For a
long time everybody blamed it on Dexcool.
I
think the final conclusion is that it is believed GM put a few clay tablets in
the
I am going to have to be more careful. That 12"
rearview mirror on my car causes a blind spot. Twice I have started to pull out
or go, only to find a car turning in front of me. That big mirror and the
mounting spot causes a blind spot. I think I will have to try the 11" mirror to
see if it
Yea, on my '69 I'm looking straight into it, I have to look under or over
it which is a problem. I'm going to look for a mirror that either
has a short mounting arm, or one that mounts to the windshield. I
need to get something smaller and higher mounted.
BTW: with a 4" cowl hood, this is a bit
Hiya list,
So I'm kind of a beginning hot rodder. That is to say, I just bought the
car I've always wanted - a 67 Malibu (okay, I would have liked to have an
SS, but don't tell her that. :o] ) but I don't know much about what I'm
doing yet. Too bad for me, because she's a little under the
Yeah, me too, that big mirror is a problem with the 3 1/2 cowl hood, there ain't much room to look under it, but i guess it has to work untill i can get it changed.
-Steve
1972 Chevelle Malibu
GAS, GRASS, OR ASS
NO ONE RIDES FREE
From: Michael Pell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL
Your top mechanism is different,no motor ,no rams,no nylon lines,just big
springs added to help you manually pull the top up or down.A power top was
an option until 1970 and in 71 they finally made it a standard feature.
Grant
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
I think ur friend is mistaken about a new chevelle. I am a hotwheel
collector and in hot rod mag. it says this is what it might look like. they
are not bringing back the chevelle.
From: Michael Pell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
if i'm not mistaken here, but when the "real" chevelles were being produced, I thought it had to be a Chevelle before a Malibu, Malibu being the level of luxury above a 300 or 300 Deluxe series. So theoretically if this is how it was, doesn't that mean that the Chevelle is still in existence
20 matches
Mail list logo
