Well then, my apologies in return. I thought you were berating those
of us who replied. Since you're referring to the 10 year old, offend
away. :-)
take care,
Quoting Ken's Email <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry I was referring to the 10 year old.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ken
>
> Michael Pell
Sorry I was referring to the 10 year old.
Cheers,
KenMichael Pell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's a real nice way to treat those who took a moment to answer yourquestion (other than the 10 year old who needs a good old fashionedwhipping)Those of us who've been down the road of restoring
That's a real nice way to treat those who took a moment to answer your
question (other than the 10 year old who needs a good old fashioned
whipping)
Those of us who've been down the road of restoring an old car understand
that it's not an "investment" in terms of making money, but in terms of
Ken's
EmailSent: Monday, August 04, 2003 1:29 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Chevelle
Malibus vs. Chevelle SS'= return values Legitimate question and
concern...
What ? Pragley ? Did you not understand the original question
?
Thanks to
What ? Pragley ? Did you not understand the original question ?
Thanks to Dale and a few others for a reasonable response. Just musing here. When I checked my totals on this 67 Chevelle, I realized how much I had spent already. Then, when I realize I have two sons to send to college, I go on a
5 matches
Mail list logo
