To: The Chevelle Mailing ListSubject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Z/28
engine
The only difference between the
1964-65 L76 and L84 engines was the induction system used. The L76 had a
high-rise intake with Holley carb and obviously the L84 had the Rochester fuel
injection. Both use
| 355/700R4 | F-Body Brakes |
275/40/17 Kumho MX
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
DaleSent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 3:52 PMTo: 'The
Chevelle Mailing List'Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Z/28
engine
Sorry didn’t list
the base 327, o
Better marketing? :-)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dale
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 6:52
PM
To: 'The
Chevelle Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] Z/28
engine
Sorry didn’t list the base 327,
only the optional 327s.
1967 Chevelle Reference
CD beta now available!
ACES
#1709/TC Gold #92
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clint HooperSent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 11:37
AMTo: The Chevelle Mailing ListSubject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Z/28
en
#92
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Clint Hooper
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 5:43
PM
To: The
Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Z/28
engine
The only difference between the 1964-65 L76 and L84 engines
was the induction system used
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clint HooperSent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 11:37
AMTo: The Chevelle Mailing ListSubject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Z/28
engine
The 1963 327's with Rochester injection were
rated at 360hp. Not sure why they increased the hp rating to 375.
I've forgotten wh
-list] Z/28
engine
The 1963 327's with Rochester
injection were rated at 360hp. Not sure why they increased the hp
rating to 375. I've forgotten what was changed in the engine to make the extra
power,if anything.
They also made a 365hp Holley carb'd 327 in 1965.
List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Z/28
engine
At 09:55 AM 7/19/2005, you wrote:
>
>To go from a 350 to a 302 just requires one to change the crank and
pistons.
>A 302 would be a dog in a later 66-72 Chevelle because of the extra weight.
>If you want something to rev to the moon and
Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List"
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Z/28 engine
-- Original message --
From: "Gene's General Restoration Parts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here i
-- Original message --
From: "Gene's General Restoration Parts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Here is an interesting read on the bore stroke combos from the factory.
>
> Early Small Blocks
> Most current GM small-block V8s (the LT and LS series) trace their lineage
> to the
e f
> Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 6:51 AM
> To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Z/28 engine
>
> So, why would any current owner/builder think about
> destroking a sbc? I think CHP did an article on making
> a 327. There were so few 302's and riding
The 1963 327's with Rochester injection were rated
at 360hp. Not sure why they increased the hp rating to 375. I've
forgotten what was changed in the engine to make the extra power,if anything.
They also made a 365hp Holley carb'd 327 in 1965.
Anyone know the different power ratings of the
At 10:34 AM 7/19/2005, you wrote:
>
>Actually,the L84 was uprated to 375hp in the 1965 Corvette. I know,I
had two
>of them,,a coupe and a roadster.
375 was the FI .
Yep, I had a 65 326/365 with the holly conv, wish I never
sold it. 4 speed, Wonder what it's worth now.. (I don't want to
know).
well I just cut and pasted this info, but I thought there was a 375 hp 327
when I read this
Gene
- Original Message -
From: "Clint Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List"
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-li
Actually,the L84 was uprated to 375hp in the 1965 Corvette. I know,I had two
of them,,a coupe and a roadster.
1967 Corvettes could also be equipped with the L68 427 that was basically a
390hp with tripower induction.
Clint Hooper
H&H Custom,owner
1969 El Camino ProTourer
2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
n
- Original Message -
From: "Clint Hooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List"
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Z/28 engine
To go from a 350 to a 302 just requires one to change the crank and
pistons.
A 30
At 09:55 AM 7/19/2005, you wrote:
>
>To go from a 350 to a 302 just requires one to change the crank and
pistons.
>A 302 would be a dog in a later 66-72 Chevelle because of the extra
weight.
>If you want something to rev to the moon and still pull a heavier
car
>around,build a 348 (400 block with
To go from a 350 to a 302 just requires one to change the crank and pistons.
A 302 would be a dog in a later 66-72 Chevelle because of the extra weight.
If you want something to rev to the moon and still pull a heavier car
around,build a 348 (400 block with 327 crank) or a 377 (400block with 350
cr
So, why would any current owner/builder think about
destroking a sbc? I think CHP did an article on making
a 327. There were so few 302's and riding in a car
that the motor was comfortable at 4000 to over 7000
was so cool. Again, can a 350 be destroked enough?
mike
--- Clint Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECT
Date: 07/18/05 17:42:00
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Z/28 engine
The main negative feature of a DZ302 engine is their lack of low end torque and corresponding need for steep gearing. My 69 Z/28 had 4.10 cogs and still could have used something shorter like 4.56'
The main negative feature of a DZ302 engine is
their lack of low end torque and corresponding need for steep gearing. My 69
Z/28 had 4.10 cogs and still could have used something shorter like 4.56's or
4.88's. The standard ratio in those cars was a 3.73 and they ran like a dog with
them. Unl
To: 'The Chevelle Mailing List'
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] z 28 engine
Did you try any of the three sites I sent you?
Dale McIntosh67 El Camino1967 Chevelle Reference CD beta now available!ACES #1709/TC Gold #92
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh
@chevelles.net
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] z 28
engine
Gene:
thanks for the help. My buddy wants to build one ,and since ive never built a
motor this sounds like it would be a little easier to handle. what i ve
been told i need is valve specs and head specs ,cam specs,basicly all
.
thanks
bob
---Original Message---
From: The Chevelle Mailing List
Date: 07/17/05 15:51:07
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] z 28 engine
Basically all you need is a small jornal 327 block, a 283 crank , 302 spec pistons (or the correct hieght if you go longer
s big power (but then you might
as well build a long rod 383 and use the cross ram on it!) .
Gene
- Original Message -
From:
Dale
To: 'The Chevelle Mailing List'
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 9:43
AM
Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] z 28
engine
A fe
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of bob howard
Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 9:22
AM
To: Chevelle-list@chevelles.net
Subject: [Chevelle-list] z 28
engine
I'm
wanting to build a 302 Z 28 engine, for a 69 camero.
Where
do i or can I get a spec. shee
I'm wanting to build a 302 Z 28 engine, for a 69 camero.
Where do i or can I get a spec. sheet for building one of these engines. would this be a good engine for a 64 chevelle? just a little bit of nostalgia working here!!
Bob
65SS chevelle
27 matches
Mail list logo
