felix winkelmann scripsit:
> * `signum' is now exactness-preserving
This is now true in the main system, but not in the numbers egg.
--
John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.reutershealth.com www.ccil.org/~cowan
Rather than making ill-conceived suggestions for improvement based on
uninformed gu
Hi,
Using chicken 2.106 & 2.107, running benchmarks:
earley 0.001 Error: shell invocation failed with non-zero
return status
"../chicken earley.scm -quiet -no-warnings -heap-size 8m -output-file
tmpfile.c -debug-level 0 -optimize-level 3 -block -disable-interrupts
-lambda-lift
Hi,
When I define a type like c-string, int, and others as 'const' (i.e.
(const c-string), (const int), ..) their accessors give garbage output.
Just wanted to note it.. maybe I'll have time to figure it out in a week
or so. Just making them mutable for now..
thanks,
Daniel
__
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Daniel B. Faken wrote:
> I'm switching from using my own version of CHICKEN_eval_string()
> & friends to the builtin one, which is now a callback.
> When I was using my own version, I defined it in the normal top-level
> scheme file, and my eval-fn had access to all the un
Hello,
Felix - Thanks for redoing the FFI stuff! its much nicer :).
Background:
I'm switching from using my own version of CHICKEN_eval_string()
& friends to the builtin one, which is now a callback.
When I was using my own version, I defined it in the normal top-level
scheme file, and m
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 08:53:37AM +0200, felix winkelmann wrote:
> Q3: What are you missing most desperately from Chicken, or better:
> if there is one thing that you really want it to have, what would that be?
I would like have an arity-function, i.e.:
(define (bla fasel) ...)
(arity bla) =
