On 5/29/06, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a small observation -- the propensity for long,
complicated URL's isn't a win. Typing the full
www.call/cc.org is a pain; the galinha site is also
not something I can memorize, and the same goes for
the united freaks site.
You could always use
I now we're living in the age of delicious, but typing a good URL is
always the fastest. No, local bookmarks don't cut it -- there's
already too many of them.
Maybe it's just me, but I'd love shorter, memorable URL's.
Dan, I'm think if you buy us some shorter, memorable, domains, the
admins
Now, I have absolutely no problem with this. There is just one
catch: I don't want to maintain two versions of the manual, and we
definitely need something that can be installed locally.
Personally, I would suggest that we use
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br/coop, since it's internal format can
On 5/29/06, Alejandro Forero Cuervo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now, I have absolutely no problem with this. There is just one
catch: I don't want to maintain two versions of the manual, and we
definitely need something that can be installed locally.
Personally, I would suggest that we use
On May 29, 2006, at 12:09 PM, Alejandro Forero Cuervo wrote:
I don't think it would make much of a difference, though (which is
why I'm not buying them myself).
call/cc would make a difference w/ search engines.
How so? Lots of people searching call/cc instead of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 29, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
Greetings,
I sent this question to the list last week but it complained about me
not being a subscriber. I'll assume it did not get through, so here
it is again:
Looking at the definition of
What is the list length of (1 . 2) anyway? Only 1 makes sense.
Hmm, I think throwing an error, —just like (length 'foo) does—, would
make more sense than returning 1 for (length '(1 . 2)).
Same goes for a circular list: throwing an error would make more sense
than failing to return, the small
I don't think it would make much of a difference, though (which is
why I'm not buying them myself).
call/cc would make a difference w/ search engines.
How so? Lots of people searching call/cc instead of
call-with-current-continuation, is that what you mean?
Yes.
I believe that of all
At Mon, 29 May 2006 03:12:06 -0700 (PDT), Dan wrote:
Just a small observation -- the propensity for long,
complicated URL's isn't a win. Typing the full
www.call/cc.org is a pain; the galinha site is also
not something I can memorize, and the same goes for
the united freaks site.
I like
