Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg

2008-03-16 Thread Alex Shinn
Felix == Felix Winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Felix Alex, what happens if I pass string operators as first Felix class values? These don't get inlined. What Felix happens now? I actually thought the change you introduced didn't really inline most of the operators but

Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg

2008-03-16 Thread Alex Shinn
Kon == Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kon On Mar 15, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Felix Winkelmann wrote: Kon Is this a char-string issue or a byte-string Kon issue? When the source ...string... is a string Kon of ASCII non-nul char then there should be no Kon problem w/ the utf8

Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg

2008-03-16 Thread Alex Shinn
Kon == Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kon Is this a char-string issue or a byte-string Kon issue? When the source ...string... is a string Kon of ASCII non-nul char then there should be no Kon problem w/ the utf8 egg overriding the string Kon operators. The problem

[Chicken-users] Spiffy relies on removed proc.

2008-03-16 Thread Robin Lee Powell
In the latest spiffy.scm is: (parameterize ([http:error-response-handler (http-resource:error-handler exn)]) but http-resource:error-handler was removed in 3.5 (3.7 is current). The last time it appeared, in 3.4, it looked like this: (define (http-resource:error-handler ex) (lambda (code

Re: [Chicken-users] Re: Problems with csc and csi under MinGW + MSYS

2008-03-16 Thread Ivan Raikov
Yes, I can run sh+csi from the Windows shell, just not from rxvt. Is this a known issue with rxvt under MinGW? -Ivan Ivan Shmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 1) After building and installing Chicken development snapshot 3.0.8, the csi REPL seems to go into an infinite loop upon

Re: [Chicken-users] Problems with csc and csi under MinGW + MSYS

2008-03-16 Thread Ivan Raikov
I believe I know the cause of the error with chicken-setup. It appears that Chicken is unable to find any file in the MinGW filesystem: csi (file-exists? (make-absolute-pathname /usr/local/bin chicken.exe)) #f $ ls /usr/local/bin/chicken.exe /usr/local/bin/chicken.exe The file exists in

Re: [Chicken-users] fixnum problem in http egg is back, magically.

2008-03-16 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 07:23:33PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 07:10:14PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: [SPIFFY: (root) reading /home/rlpowell/svn/sert/test.scm with size 222.0#unspecified] Error: (file-read) bad argument type - not a fixnum: 222.0 Error: 500

Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy relies on removed proc.

2008-03-16 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:21:13AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: In the latest spiffy.scm is: (parameterize ([http:error-response-handler (http-resource:error-handler exn)]) but http-resource:error-handler was removed in 3.5 (3.7 is current). The last time it appeared, in 3.4, it

Re: [Chicken-users] URLs for Chicken websites, wiki outage

2008-03-16 Thread Tobia Conforto
What about choosing one of the new domains and putting all the services on it? Front page: www.chicken-scheme.org Wiki: wiki.chicken-scheme.org Trac: trac.chicken-scheme.org Search box: index.chicken-scheme.org The old domains could be configured to do http 301

Re: [Chicken-users] URLs for Chicken websites, wiki outage

2008-03-16 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 03:24:05PM +0100, Tobia Conforto wrote: What about choosing one of the new domains and putting all the services on it? Front page: www.chicken-scheme.org Wiki: wiki.chicken-scheme.org Trac: trac.chicken-scheme.org Search box:

Re: [Chicken-users] ditching syntax-case modules for the utf8 egg

2008-03-16 Thread Kon Lovett
On Mar 16, 2008, at 12:07 AM, Alex Shinn wrote: Kon == Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kon On Mar 15, 2008, at 9:33 AM, Felix Winkelmann wrote: Kon Is this a char-string issue or a byte-string Kon issue? When the source ...string... is a string Kon of ASCII non-nul char

[Chicken-users] ANN: Updated srfi-29, procedure-surface, levenshtein eggs

2008-03-16 Thread Kon Lovett
Hi Folks, - srfi-29 1.7.0: Cached template lookup. 'localized-template' takes default parameter. Added 'localized-format', 'current-locale-format- function'. - procedure-surface 1.1.0: Removed syntax-case dependency. - levenshtein 1.7.0: Removed syntax-case dependency. Requirement of

[Chicken-users] Proposed egg-post-commit changes.

2008-03-16 Thread Robin Lee Powell
So I mentioned in an earlier mail that I'd like to do 2-fork documentation: wiki for general docs and examples and so on, and mole-generated docs for actual function definitions. Turns out egg-post-commit won't allow this. I've got some suggested changes here, first to the .meta file, then to

Re: [Chicken-users] Problem with ~?

2008-03-16 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:13:52AM -0700, Kon Lovett wrote: Fixed in chicken/trunk. This was a holdover from a previous incarnation of fprintf which didn't use a string buffer but wrote directly to the port. Not all ramifications of the change were investigated. Fix confirmed. Thanks!

Spiffy relies on content-length (was Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy relies on removed proc.)

2008-03-16 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 03:20:11PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote: Thanks for the error report! I've fixed the bug and added a testcase for it so it will not happen again. I've also pushed a new release which should be available shortly (3.8). It seems to work now, but this leads to a more general

Re: Spiffy relies on content-length (was Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy relies on removed proc.)

2008-03-16 Thread Robin Lee Powell
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 04:48:29PM -0400, Graham Fawcett wrote: Well, you've got three options that I can think of: 1) use a Content-Length header, 2) use a Connection: close header to prevent keep-alive, 3) use chunked encoding to send responses of arbitrary length, but retaining

Re: Spiffy relies on content-length (was Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy relies on removed proc.)

2008-03-16 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 02:56:11PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: With define-http-resource, *Spiffy* defines the headers, and it never asks the body. In fact, the headers are sent before the body is run. That's not entirely correct. Spiffy parameterizes the headers. You can override them

Re: Spiffy relies on content-length (was Re: [Chicken-users] Spiffy relies on removed proc.)

2008-03-16 Thread Graham Fawcett
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 02:56:11PM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: With define-http-resource, *Spiffy* defines the headers, and it never asks the body. In fact, the headers are sent before the body is run. That's not