A suggestion ...
Please consider adding realpath to posix. If I understand correctly
realpath is a specified part of posix and thus would quite naturally fit
into the posix unit. I think it is a very handy routine and I use it
extensively. Then again, perhaps most sane environments don't have the
Matt Welland scripsit:
> Please consider adding realpath to posix. If I understand correctly
> realpath is a specified part of posix and thus would quite naturally fit
> into the posix unit.
I agree; having it is a Good Thing, and it's quite portable as well as
being part of POSIX.1-2001 and lat
On Apr 1, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Matt Welland wrote:
> Note that normalize-path is not the same as realpath and that although
> realpath would be nice to have calling the system realpath works just fine
> and so this is a suggestion and not a request
What is "the system realpath"?
Jim
___
Hi!
I have got a C lib that takes function pointers and wants to call
those at random points in time (at least from the scheme side point
of view). I do provide these using a define-external and passing
then the location of that procedure around.
The issue seems to be that the function actually i
On Apr 1, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Matt Welland wrote:
>
>> Note that normalize-path is not the same as realpath and that although
>> realpath would be nice to have calling the system realpath works just fine
>> and so this is a suggestion and not a
In case it helps, I've added resolve-pathname to the posix-extras egg in
version 0.1.2.
On Apr 1, 2012, at 12:54 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2012, at 12:22 PM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
>
>> On Apr 1, 2012, at 11:15 AM, Matt Welland wrote:
>>
>>> Note that normalize-path is not the same as
