Brandon wrote :
"Lightweight" can be a valid design choice. I'm just pointing out the
strategic consequences of fixating on that. I mean, let's face it,
people intoned all those ideas and desires some months ago and nothing
has come of it.
Hehe, only because I'm damn slow ... but I'm still
On 7/6/07, John Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alex Queiroz scripsit:
> It's developed at the same university of one of my preferred
> languages, Lua.
Hmmm. Chicken needs a Lua egg!
I have most of it working, where you thinking of something
particular? Or is evaluating Lua code enough
Alex Queiroz scripsit:
> It's developed at the same university of one of my preferred
> languages, Lua.
Hmmm. Chicken needs a Lua egg!
--
John Cowan[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ccil.org/~cowan
This great college [Trinity], of this ancient university [Cambridge],
has seen some strange si
Hallo,
On 7/5/07, Martin DeMello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Motif bit is offputting, but this looks like a very interesting
library - as you said, it's increasingly hard to find something that
is just a GUI. How did you discover it? I've never come across it
before.
It's developed at
On 7/4/07, Alex Queiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was looking for something:
+ With native controls;
+ MIT or BSD-licensed;
+ Lightweight and *just* a GUI;
+ C, not C++;
+ Works in Linux & Windows, at least.
I couldn't find anything that covered all of this, so started an
IUP[1] bi
Hallo,
On 7/4/07, Brandon Van Every <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/4/07, Alex Queiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> + Lightweight and *just* a GUI;
>
> Although the API is very small, the egg is far from finished
> though, so probably this is not what you want. Otherwise, feel free to
> a
On 7/4/07, Alex Queiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+ Lightweight and *just* a GUI;
Although the API is very small, the egg is far from finished
though, so probably this is not what you want. Otherwise, feel free to
ask more.
Felix was intoning "lightweight" back when we had that GUI disc
Hallo,
On 7/3/07, Martin DeMello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not really focused on a "professional" GUI - what I need is
i. A reasonably complete set of bindings
ii. A pleasant GUI development experience (I'd use OCaml, but lablgtk
is pretty ugly)
iii. The ability to deliver native executabl
What is the currently preferred cross-platform gui library to use with
chicken? Are there any examples of real-world gui applications?
I have been working a great deal with Gtk 2.0 via EasyFFI. I looked
at the Gtk egg being developed, but had no success in trying to
test it. I think what the
On 7/3/07, Jong-Hyouk Yun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I found some mailings in archive.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2007-02/msg00055.html
I went through that thread, but it seems to be mostly about future
directions for a toolkit. I want to know which if any of the curre
Jong-Hyouk Yun wrote:
Hi, I found some mailings in archive.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2007-02/msg00055.html
I saw recently that there is a GTK directory in the Chicken CVS tree. Is
that related to the above-mentioned thread? Is it in active development?
BTW, I really
Hi, I found some mailings in archive.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2007-02/msg00055.html
Cheers.
2007/7/3, Martin DeMello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
What is the currently preferred cross-platform gui library to use with
chicken? Are there any examples of real-world gui applicatio
What is the currently preferred cross-platform gui library to use with
chicken? Are there any examples of real-world gui applications?
martin
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-user
13 matches
Mail list logo
