On Dec 20, 2007 6:05 PM, Siegfried Gonzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Chicken implements numbers as double precision?
fixnums (31-bit signed integers on 32 bit platforms, or 65-bit on
64-bit platforms) and flonums (64 bit double precision floats).
cheers,
felix
__
On Dec 20, 2007 6:17 PM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 6:05 PM, Siegfried Gonzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Chicken implements numbers as double precision?
>
> fixnums (31-bit signed integers on 32 bit platforms, or 65-bit on
> 64-bit platforms) and flonums (6
On Dec 20, 2007 6:27 PM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2007 6:17 PM, felix winkelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 20, 2007 6:05 PM, Siegfried Gonzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Chicken implements numbers as double precision?
> >
> > fixnums (31-bit s
I downloade numbers and srfi-56. But I get the following error when using
srfi-56 and there is no specific comment in the source code:
==
siegfried-gonzis-macbook:test sgonzi$ csc srfi-56-test.scm
Warning: can not represent exact fraction - coerced to flonum in line 154
"1/3"
Warning: can not re
Siegfried Gonzi scripsit:
> siegfried-gonzis-macbook:test sgonzi$ csc srfi-56-test.scm
Just downloading the egg does not load it into the compiler. You need
to download syntax-case as well, and then put "(use numbers) (use syntax-case)"
at the top of the file, or use the equivalent csc options.
On Dec 21, 2007 5:04 AM, Siegfried Gonzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I downloade numbers and srfi-56. But I get the following error when using
> srfi-56 and there is no specific comment in the source code:
>
> ==
> siegfried-gonzis-macbook:test sgonzi$ csc srfi-56-test.scm
That should be
csi
Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:05:05 +0900
> Von: "Alex Shinn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> SRFI-56 did go through a peer review - that's what the SRFI process
> is. The reason for the withdrawal was explained on the list. As a
> library
> of binary parsing utilities
