I didn't see any, but we had discussed a couple of possible ways to
get there at an earlier meeting.
The first was to perhaps use AppCache manifests to declare this sort
of metadata. You might have some sort of header in the manifest that
describes the page as "persistently bless-able" (much like
On Aug 6, 2009, at 1:43 AM, yoav zilberberg wrote:
> No adam, i did not sumbit patches to the sandbox :) i just used its
> API's to forward calls from kernel32.dll to my own DLL's so i could
> inject code to VC.exe and force it to run in the idle priority
> class
>
> but i still don't g
On Aug 5, 2009, at 11:52 PM, yoav zilberberg wrote:
> Jeremy, i can't see how it will make things any worse to punch these
> holes
>
> you still fork flash in its own process like you do now
> only you sandbox it how is it any worse ?
Please trust authoritative folks like Carlos when they
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Dean McNamee wrote:
>
> I feel like people are using tabs as a replacement for a good history
> system. At least in all current browser implementations, tabs are
> "running". Even if we can make the UI scale to 1000 tabs, the 500
> flash instances that are likely
that I'd be pained to see another (parallel) API
for.
Regards
On Jun 1, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Erik Kay wrote:
> This proposal is specifically not to fix the DOM, but to exist
> outside of it without having to inject scripts into the page.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 200
On Jun 1, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Erik Kay wrote:
> Similar to the translate, this feature could be used to support
> sites that use non-standard character set / font combinations (some
> indic websites depend on downloadable fonts and custom character
> sets).
>
> Also, if the API allowed styli
Does green builder output for this bot get archived? I ask because it
would be nice to be able to specify a safesync URL for gclient.
Regards
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
> It is now fairly easy to develop Chrome using tip-of-tree WebKit.
>
> First before doing anythi
Not sure what our build-bots report. M-A?
Regards
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> Does this use the latest version that works on windows, linux and mac? ...
> or, only windows?
> -Darin
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Alex Russell w
Howdy all:
The tree has been incredibly green of late thanks to continued
dedication to stability and test fixing, but there are those times
when you might still get bitten by non-green revs costing you time as
you try to figure out why a build failed only to discover it's not
your fault. To avoi
working on it.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Patrick Johnson wrote:
> Nice! Can we add an option to gclient to make it automatically sync to the
> last known good revision?
> Patrick
>
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Marc-Andre Decoste
> wrote:
>>
>> Salut Chromium-Dev'ers,
>> if you
e when sub-pixel hinting was still rare. I'm
not sure that implies that we should do anything in particular WRT
Droid, though.
Regards
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Evan Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Alex Russell wrote:
>> A potential plus is that we could (fina
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Alex Russell
> wrote:
>>
>> What do others think about including this font with Chrome and making
>> it available to content in the font-family list by default? Also, it
>> o
Hi all,
With 2.0 including the new "@font-face" feature, it'd be great if
Chromium were starting to sport more (and better) typographic options,
particularly well-licensed fonts. There aren't a lot of fonts today
that are both good and open, but after a discussion with Glen and a
little bit of di
Sorry to be late on this:
2009/2/10 Aaron Boodman :
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Matt Perry wrote:
>> Does anyone else have any thoughts about scripts vs full HTML?
[ snip ]
> I don't think that we should provide an automatic way to get to this
> page through the UI, though (for exampl
On Jan 29, 2009, at 10:32 AM, Paweł Prażak wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jan 28, 10:18 pm, "Ben Goodger (Google)" wrote:
>> First of all let me generally comment that this entire situation is a
>> clusterf*ck. I am not happy with the technical constraints imposed by
>> Linux and its assorted UIs on Chrome's
If that's a serious problem, how about we just try loading the app w/
the flag enabled and if that fails retry w/o it? Defining "fails" is
hard, but the user could tell us. I know that I'd want the flag for
apps/frameworks I build, particularly if we're going to open up
new/better/different APIs f
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> I'm not sure I understand all this email, but I'll take a shot at it.
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Simon B. wrote:
>
>> Maybe row-numbering the suggestions also for real, in the browser,
>> could help somehow? I could maybe type skä
Agreed. I'm still "me" in incognito, it's just that the things I want the
system to remember have changed.
Regards
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:53 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
>
>> My thought is that extensions should not apply in the incognito mode
18 matches
Mail list logo
