On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Fady Samuel fadysam...@gmail.com wrote:
Which brings me back to the original topic of replicated state. Is there
any reason not to have a single monolithic cache (or other similar state)
across all processes other than synchronization issues or fault tolerance?
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Fady Samuel fadysam...@gmail.com wrote:
Charles, I've read your paper and ultimately I think my goal may be
somewhere along the lines of making the DOM tree thread-safe by applying my
research in iterators and lock-free data structures.
A tricky question:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Michael Moss mm...@chromium.org wrote:
http://codereview.chromium.org/271113 may require a clobber for Linux
builds.
I should belatedly observe that the Linux make build, at least, is
supposed to detect command line changes and so should not need a
clobber. If
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
Why will it certainly not work? From what (little) I understand,
SOCK_SEQPACKET adds
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
If anyone gets the chance, I would happily pre-LGTM a change that
stuffs some comments near this code explaining the reasoning for this.
http
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Jacob Mandelson ja...@mandelson.org wrote:
Which reads like all or nothing to me, though I could imagine a (perverse?)
implementation with each writer having a send buffer lower layer pulling
data
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
There was some concern that a renderer could use sendto on a
SOCK_DGRAM to direct packets to other destinations. However, when
created with socketpair,
zygote_host_linux.cc creates a socketpair using SOCK_SEQPACKET rather
than the more usual SOCK_STREAM? Before I trawl through code, does
anyone know why? This is a problem for the FreeBSD port: FreeBSD
doesn't support SOCK_SEQPACKET for unix domain sockets...
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
zygote_host_linux.cc creates a socketpair using SOCK_SEQPACKET rather
than the more usual SOCK_STREAM? Before I trawl through code, does
anyone know why
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
Why will it certainly not work? From what (little) I understand,
SOCK_SEQPACKET adds record boundaries to SOCK_STREAM ... presumably
one could simulate
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Paweł Hajdan
Jr.phajdan...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:16, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
In this case, the code may have been submitted by a committer
without using the trybots (tsk, tsk). We don't currently mention
the trybots on
By default, cflags includes -Werror ... (see build/common.gypi).
It seems something disables this for WebCore (which is built by
webkit/webkit.gyp:webcore) but I can't figure out what - does anyone
know?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
it seems like a battle
worth fighting :-)
BTW, did you know what -Wall -W (but not -W -Wall) turns on yet more warnings?
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
I think no one has gone back
As brettw requested, I ported chrome/browser/renderer_host/ and base/.
This is now done and can be reviewed here:
http://codereview.chromium.org/172032
The description summarises the changes I made, what do people think?
(I haven't forgot that I said I'd document defines - I'll do that once
I forgot to mention - there's a single file that may not be complete,
base/crypto/signature_verifier_nss.cc - this is because the FreeBSD
port of NSS is too old and doesn't have a function it needs. I'll get
to that at some point soon, but I don't anticipate it being a problem.
On Thu, Aug 27,
If I do a gcl try, I get prompted for a password for 'ben', which is
my login name on my FreeBSD machine. Whatever I enter, the script then
hangs - investigation shows that this is because it is prompting for a
username, but gcl is swallowing the output.
If I then enter b...@chromium.org, I get
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Ben Laurieb...@google.com wrote:
Added USE_GDK, set when either TOOLKIT_GTK or TOOLKIT_VIEWS is set but
not OS_WIN.
I believe VIEWS still uses GTK (for bits like the omnibox).
So this
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:00 AM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
I kinda feel like this is one of those things you can try hard to
premeditate, but in the end you'll just have to deal with it being
ugly for a while and hope it eventually converges to something better.
Sort of a
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:21 AM, Ben Goodger (Google)b...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't know much about the technical details at play here, but a
couple of high level notes:
- I am sympathetic to concerns around codebase cleanliness. Many
people (like Brett) have spent very many months
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruelmar...@google.com wrote:
I don't mind as long it's documented on dev.chromium.org.
Ben, ping me if you want to setup a freebsd slave on fyi. As long as you
want to babysit it. :)
Cool - I haven't got that far yet, but when it builds, I'll be
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:56 AM, Brett Wilsonbre...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Brett Wilsonbre...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
I kinda feel like this is one of those things you can try hard to
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Ben Laurieb...@chromium.org wrote:
I'd be happy to do that. When I do, there's something that's already
puzzling me, and that's OS_POSIX.
I don't have a copy of the POSIX standard, at least
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Ben Laurieb...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Ben Laurieb...@chromium.org wrote:
I'd be happy to do
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Joel Stanleyj...@jms.id.au wrote:
When I first got Chromium going on the beagleboard it was slow. I
believe the the main slowdown is due to the limited RAM (128MB), but
another factor was the slow disk I/O due to the root fs being held on
a cheap SD card.
I've started working on a FreeBSD port. The first patch is here:
http://codereview.chromium.org/172032.
When looking at the patch, bear in mind a couple of things...
1. Added gyp lines for files like *_ar.pak are compensating for the fact
that i18n targets are not currently being handled
I see some people like to use git to work on chromium. How about
mercurial? Has anyone tried it? Is there some reason it doesn't work
so well?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email
, but uses WebCore.
-Darin
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
I just got bitten by failing to
#include config.h
in a file. This caused that file to have a different version of KURL
from the rest of the code (it did not use GOOGLEURL, whereas the rest
did
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Ian Fettei...@chromium.org wrote:
So far as I can tell, the page is not instantiating Java. it's instantiating
acrobat / flash, and perhaps that instantiates java? At any rate, so far as
I can tell there's little that can be done here.
I presume you mean
If you have a rule that produces multiple outputs, for example, the
one for src/chrome/app/theme/theme_resources.grd, the make build
currently works incorrectly if an error is encountered after the first
output is produced - subsequent makes do not try to rebuild the
outputs (e.g. try introducing
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Evan Martinev...@chromium.org wrote:
[retry with proper email address, please respond to this one if you
got the other one]
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Ben Laurieb...@google.com wrote:
If you have a rule that produces multiple outputs, for example, the
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Ben Laurieb...@google.com wrote:
There's a big comment block about five lines below where you made that
modification talking about how to express multiple outputs to make,
along with a link to
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Brian Rakowskibr...@chromium.org wrote:
The most promising things I found from the design challenge were the history
view in Favitabs n' Drawers (see attached image). The cool thing about it
is that it shows how long the tabs were open. I find other history
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Peter Kastingpkast...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Mike Beltzner beltz...@mozilla.com wrote:
All we're doing at this point is preventing malicious applications from
eating up disk, really.
Yep, I agree (although that may no longer be
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:23 PM, Mike Beltzner beltz...@mozilla.com
wrote:
All we're doing at this point is preventing malicious applications
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Wan-Teh Changw...@google.com wrote:
Ben,
I believe the GCC warning you want is -Wreturn-type, which is enabled
if we specify -Wall:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.3/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options
Are we not compiling with -Wall?
Apparently
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Ben Laurie b...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Wan-Teh Changw...@google.com wrote:
Ben,
I believe the GCC warning you want is -Wreturn-type, which is enabled
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Ben Laurieb...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Ben Laurie b...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Mike Mammarellam...@chromium.org wrote:
gcc/g++ have __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) that you can specify
on a per-function basis:
http://www.ohse.de/uwe/articles/gcc-attributes.html#func-warn_unused_result
Or do you mean warnings when a function is
I just fixed a bug that wouldn't have happened at all if missing
return values were flagged ... is there a way to turn on compiler
warnings (building on Linux using make)? Is there some reason they're
not on by default?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=15904
Something went wrong with quoting when some v8-related script was
upstreamed. Dimitri's working on it.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Mike
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Dimitri Glazkovdglaz...@google.com wrote:
Apply this locally, if you want to get rid of them:
diff --git a/WebCore/bindings/scripts/IDLParser.pm
b/WebCore/bindings/scripts/IDLParser.pm
index c4cb041..0a6832f 100644
--- a/WebCore/bindings/scripts/IDLParser.pm
Following http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxMakeBuild, I get
this error:
chrome/browser/debugger/devtools_window.cc:23:38: error:
grit/generated_resources.h: No such file or directory
and, indeed, if I look:
$ ls out/Debug/obj/gen/chrome/grit
browser_resources.h renderer_resources.h
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Mike Belshembel...@google.com wrote:
Anecdotally, a couple of people have said it works and a couple of people
have said it makes no difference. I do believe that people doing compiles
could see a difference.
To determine if it was real, we did an experiment
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Ben Goodger (Google)b...@chromium.org wrote:
Sounds like a dependency issue. Can you explicitly build the
chrome_strings target and then try building the target you were
trying to build again?
$ make chrome_strings
make: *** No rule to make target
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Ben Laurieb...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Ben Goodger (Google)b...@chromium.org wrote:
Sounds like a dependency issue. Can you explicitly build the
chrome_strings target and then try building the target you were
trying to build again?
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
Patches are welcome. It looks like maybe in chrome.gyp, the debugger
target should also debug on chrome_strings ?
Er, it should also _depend_ on.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
Patches are welcome. It looks like maybe in chrome.gyp, the debugger
target should also debug on chrome_strings ?
Oh, hmmm. I didn't consider that. My personal preference is that
dependencies should be calculated
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Ben Laurieb...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
Patches are welcome. It looks like maybe in chrome.gyp, the debugger
target should also debug on chrome_strings ?
Oh, hmmm. I didn't consider that. My
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
Patches are welcome. It looks like maybe in chrome.gyp, the debugger
target should also debug on chrome_strings ?
Yeah. Here's the patch:
http://codereview.chromium.org/150165
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Ben
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:02 AM, Ben Laurieb...@google.com wrote:
Following http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxMakeBuild, I get
this error:
I really apologize. I made this build as a quick hack and now people
are
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Ben Laurieb...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Ben Laurieb...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Ben Goodger (Google)b...@chromium.org
wrote:
Sounds like a
53 matches
Mail list logo
