Macs appear to support MADV_DONTNEED (at least they are doc'ed as such).
However, wtf/Platform.h seems to imply Apple uses mmap/munmap instead of
madvise for their tcmalloc fork.
The tcmalloc in third_party does not appear to have the mmap/munmap support
seen in WTF's tcmalloc, so our TCMalloc_Sy
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>> > I'm pretty sure that enabling USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC will also lead to
>> corruption
>> > since WebKit is not hermetic (we al
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure that enabling USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC will also lead to
> corruption
> > since WebKit is not hermetic (we allocate things externally that we then
> > delete inside WebKit
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>>
>> Do we plan to switch the Mac build of Chromium to use tcmalloc instead of
>> the system malloc? I thought this was the case, but I can't find any bug
>> covering the task to do that. I'
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
> On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
>
> From a performance perspective, it may be critical to use tcmalloc to match
> safari performance. It was literally a 50% speedup on most of the DOM perf
> when running on WinXP.
>
>
> Yeah
On Oct 27, 2009, at 9:10 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
> From a performance perspective, it may be critical to use tcmalloc
> to match safari performance. It was literally a 50% speedup on most
> of the DOM perf when running on WinXP.
Yeah, I've profiled some of the Dromaeo benchmarks, and the DOM
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that enabling USE_SYSTEM_MALLOC will also lead to corruption
> since WebKit is not hermetic (we allocate things externally that we then
> delete inside WebKit).
> -Darin
Wouha! That really limit our capacity to link wekbit.dl
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Mike Belshe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>>
>> Do we plan to switch the Mac build of Chromium to use tcmalloc instead of
>> the system malloc? I thought this was the case, but I can't find any bug
>> covering the task to do that. I'
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
>
>> Do we plan to switch the Mac build of Chromium to use tcmalloc instead of
>> the system malloc? I thought this was the case, but I can't find any bug
>> covering the task to do that. I'm
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Jens Alfke wrote:
> Do we plan to switch the Mac build of Chromium to use tcmalloc instead of
> the system malloc? I thought this was the case, but I can't find any bug
> covering the task to do that. I'm on the memory task force, and this
> decision could definit
10 matches
Mail list logo
