On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Tei wrote:
> Chromium is kind of awesome, but on my Ubuntu crash a bit too much. I
> am looking forward for a stable version. Dudes!, speed the thing. Will
> be this thing in the hoven for much longer? I grown impatient.
This is the wrong place to bring this up.
N
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Nicolas Sylvain wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dimitri
>> Glazkov wrote:
>>>
>>> How about we turn red for unexpected crashiness?
>>
>> Makes sense to me. We can just not retry tests that unex
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dimitri
> Glazkov wrote:
>>
>> How about we turn red for unexpected crashiness?
>
> Makes sense to me. We can just not retry tests that unexpectedly crash.
I'll make this change if we have a consensus. Do we?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dimitri Glazkov
> wrote:
>
> How about we turn red for unexpected crashiness?
>>
>
> Makes sense to me. We can just not retry tests that unexpectedly crash.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Dirk Pranke wr
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dimitri Glazkov
wrote:
> How about we turn red for unexpected crashiness?
>
Makes sense to me. We can just not retry tests that unexpectedly crash.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Dirk Pranke wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> > T
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Nicolas Sylvain wrote:
>>
>> Should unexpected flakiness turn the bot red?
>
> If it turns the bot red, then it defeats the purpose of that code. Might as
> well not retry and mark it as FAIL. (which turns the tree red).
Duh :) Makes sense.
How about we turn red
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> > +chromium-dev as others who look at the waterfall might also be confused.
> > On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Dimitri Glazkov
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sending out random people, because it'
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> +chromium-dev as others who look at the waterfall might also be confused.
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
>>
>> Sending out random people, because it's early :)
>>
>> There's a couple of things I see on the bot this mor
Our messages crossed in the ether ...
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> +chromium-dev as others who look at the waterfall might also be confused.
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
>>
>> Sending out random people, because it's early :)
>>
>> There's a cou
