Ick, it's the 4:2:0 chroma sampling, I believe. Why oh why doesn't
HDV use 4:1:1 or 4:2:2? Does anyone know if there is any good way to
handle this? The 1080to540 effect, as far as I can tell, does 4-row
field averaging to overcome this which doesn't sound to me to be the
best method. Is it?
Ok, don't use that yet! :)
The color interlacing is wrong, in my tests at least.
On 1/31/07, Dan Streetman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok try the attached patch (i.e. apply and rebuild cinelerra) and then:
1) load HDV track (make sure track size matches HDV size, e.g. 1440x1080)
2) add "Frames
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:45:24PM -0500, Wesley T Allen wrote:
> On Thursday 01 February 2007 1:46 pm, Cory K. wrote:
> > Well yes. Thats what we have to do. Go through every file to check for a
> > license header. If theres none or a GLP header we're good. If there does
> > happen to be one thats
Wesley - Thats the plan. To grep through for typical words, "LGPL"
"Artistic" "whatever". If nothing pops up we're just gonna submit the
package for review. If we do see files that come up with other licenses
we will have to go through all the files.
Wesley T Allen wrote:
> On Thursday 01 February
On Thursday 01 February 2007 1:46 pm, Cory K. wrote:
> Well yes. Thats what we have to do. Go through every file to check for a
> license header. If theres none or a GLP header we're good. If there does
> happen to be one thats licensed otherwise we have to note that
> difference in the debian/copy
Well yes. Thats what we have to do. Go through every file to check for a
license header. If theres none or a GLP header we're good. If there does
happen to be one thats licensed otherwise we have to note that
difference in the debian/copyright file.
Jeroen van de Nieuwenhof wrote:
> Maybe it's a s
Hi,
> Gentoo and *BSD users compile everything without complaining? Why?
> Because most of the time compilation is dead simple on those platforms.
> It Just Works. It is actually supposed to be that way on Debian, too.
> There is a reason Gentoo-ers have claimed Cinelerra is broken beyond
> re
Maybe it's a stupid question, but how can you make sure a file is or
isn't gpl? Should there be a header in the file containing the license
of it's lgpl or other?
Regards,
Jeroen
Cory K. schreef:
Ok. So heres what its coming down to. We have to do a full review of
_every_ file to make sure t
Ok. So heres what its coming down to. We have to do a full review of
_every_ file to make sure their all GPL. We cant take it on faith. The
license file is good enough for the admins as long as the other files
dont conflict. So if we come across 1 file that is LGPL or Artistic
licensed it will be r
2007/2/1, Herman Robak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Valentina's are both (just have a look at the apt-source lines on the
"Get Cinelerra" page).
just for clarification. mine's are source too. just add deb-src to he repo.
regards
--
^ ^
O O
(_ _)
muzzol(a)gmail.co
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 10:46 +0100, Sylvain Jousse wrote:
> Salut Herman,
>
> You all speak about compiling. I intended to use the packages
> of Valentina and Muzzol to avoid compiling, but maybe I misunderstood.
> Are theses packages source-packages to compile or executable packages?
Valentina's
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:54:58AM -0500, Cory K. wrote:
> Look, in the end all we want is help. I havnt seen 1 post that gives us
> that.
>
> Lack of effort isnt the reason it hasnt made it into distros like Fedora
> or Debian. Their are issues. People may feel they are distro issues but
> they a
What kind of help ?
We have clarified all the issues we can clarify. Now we are waiting for
patches that would bring cinelerra more in line with your policies for
inclusion... we have also given you the assurance that patches will be
accepted as long as they don't break anything, so any positive w
Look, in the end all we want is help. I havnt seen 1 post that gives us
that.
Lack of effort isnt the reason it hasnt made it into distros like Fedora
or Debian. Their are issues. People may feel they are distro issues but
they are issues none-the-less. Getting Cinelerra into distros
repositories
2007/2/1, Nicolas Maufrais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Getting Cinelerra to go in the official repositories of Debian *IS NOT*
just about adding a few lines header to each sources file and deciding
to be the maintainer.
we know. this is actually the extra work we are doing to acomplish
that goal. if
Getting Cinelerra to go in the official repositories of Debian *IS NOT*
just about adding a few lines header to each sources file and deciding
to be the maintainer.
Some thoughs:
- Can we add headers in file we didn't developped ourselves? Only one
person knows for sure where the code comes from
Here's a nice tutorial on installing Cinelerra in Ubuntu 6.10
http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=320701&highlight=cinelerra
peace,
Stian
Torsdag 01 februar 2007 04:38 skreiv Jim Smyth:
> I would have to recommend Ubuntu as well. It's pretty easy to setup and and
> Synaptic (yes I know D
2007/2/1, Andraž Tori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
this is offtopic. anyone wanting to discuss debian/unbuntu/other
distrost politics, history or anything else, please move to some other
list/private if you want to continue
agree. sorry. :)
bye
andraz
--
^ ^
O O
Do you compare me with Bush? Talking about a computer distribution is
something. Doing personnal attacks on someone you don't know is
something totally different. Before talking about FUD, you should think
twice before posting things like this on a mailing-list.
i was just making a joke. sorry
this is offtopic. anyone wanting to discuss debian/unbuntu/other
distrost politics, history or anything else, please move to some other
list/private if you want to continue
bye
andraz
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 12:19 +0100, Nicolas Maufrais wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:22:09AM +0100, muzzol wro
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:22:09AM +0100, muzzol wrote:
> >in Ubuntu is the fact that it's actually a company. While Debian
> >isn't...
> >
>
> false. ubuntu is free. canonical is a company. if canonical goes down
> ubuntu remains free. if canonical decides to release a commercial
> version of ub
Salut Nicolas,
I am very sorry, I didn't want to initate a troll at all.
My question was NOT what is the best, Ubuntu or Debian.
As some of us are working on packages for Ubuntu and Debian,
my question was "which of these packages" is the most ready-to-use?".
That's all.
Anyway, for my self, I us
2007/2/1, Nicolas Maufrais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Does anyone actually used Debian for a while and then decided to move to
Ubuntu?
/me raises his hand
as someone said, sometimes you want to stop playing and wants to start
producing. ubuntu is very straight forward so lets you decide where do
you
I use debian at work (~80 PCs with central install/admin via FAI),
stable version only. It works nice, but it outdated. 1-2 years after
bleeding edge. Ubuntu at home - latest stable version.
It does not matter if ubuntu is .com or .org, code is GPL and both
debian and ubuntu are free to the same
Does anyone actually used Debian for a while and then decided to move to
Ubuntu? Some of you recommend Ubuntu because of some advantages which is
fact directly come from Debian (Ubuntu is a derivative of Debian).
Without Debian, Ubuntu wouldn't have existed at all. What I don't like
in Ubuntu is t
Salut Herman,
You all speak about compiling. I intended to use the packages
of Valentina and Muzzol to avoid compiling, but maybe I misunderstood.
Are theses packages source-packages to compile or executable packages?
Thanks, Sylvain.
___
Ubuntu!
Since I use ubuntu, I do not spent any time for
system config, kernel compilation etc. It just works.
/* Yeah, i know it was fun
to compile kernel, patch X11 etc., but doing that 2x a year
to keep updated with bleeding edge was rather tiring. */
Marcin - using only linux for work, leis
you can use
apt-get build-dep package
to perform that operation. is not focused to standard users so im not
sure if you'll find it on front-ends like synaptic.
2007/2/1, Herman Robak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 22:38 -0500, Jim Smyth wrote:
> I would have to recommend Ubuntu as
On Wed, 2007-01-31 at 22:38 -0500, Jim Smyth wrote:
> I would have to recommend Ubuntu as well. It's pretty easy to setup
> and and Synaptic (yes I know Debian has it too) will help greatly when
> building Cinelerra. Cinelerra has its own particularly difficult
> dependency hunt when building from
29 matches
Mail list logo
