On Monday 29 May 2006 21:03, Joe Stewart wrote:
> As it works now, Frames-to-Fields takes alternating fields from the asset
> and makes frames in the timeline. Which seems to suggest it would be better
> named Frames-from-Fields. Or am I just thinking about it wrong?
Indeed, you are right. The eff
On Monday 29 May 2006 02:48 pm, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> On Monday 29 May 2006 19:27, Joe Stewart wrote:
> > On Monday 29 May 2006 12:50 pm, Andraz Tori wrote:
> > > I am bit on the shaky grounds here, since i don't know what is acutally
> > > happening...
> > >
> > >
> > > Couldn't you do it by just
On Monday 29 May 2006 19:27, Joe Stewart wrote:
> On Monday 29 May 2006 12:50 pm, Andraz Tori wrote:
> > I am bit on the shaky grounds here, since i don't know what is acutally
> > happening...
> >
> >
> > Couldn't you do it by just using frames to fields and reframe plugins?
>
> Are you talking ab
On Monday 29 May 2006 12:50 pm, Andraz Tori wrote:
> I am bit on the shaky grounds here, since i don't know what is acutally
> happening...
>
>
> Couldn't you do it by just using frames to fields and reframe plugins?
Are you talking about setting asset fps to 15, project fps to 30, and then
refra
I am bit on the shaky grounds here, since i don't know what is acutally
happening...
Couldn't you do it by just using frames to fields and reframe plugins?
(btw: i think the thing you want to do qualifies for needing a separate
rendering step ... to be easily able to work with footage that you g
I wanted to duplicate the slo-mo effect described in
http://rarevision.com/articles/slow_motion.php but couldn't figure out a way
to do it in Cinelerra without requiring a render and reimport.
Using the frames-to-fields plugin and interlaced material, you can get smooth
50% slow motion if you s
