Hannes,
I believe that ATI's latest Linux drivers do support OpenGL2.0, as the
following press release from 1/18/06 (RSS feed:
http://www.ati.com/online/rss/atilinuxdriver.rss?OTC-rssfeedlinux) indicates:
-
Linux Proprietary Driver 8.21.7 Release: x86 and x86_64 variants
NEW
Le 06.09.2006 00:59:49, Nicolas a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:31:10PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
On Sunday 27 August 2006 20:18, Johannes Sixt wrote:
We've completed the merge. Expect a substantial number of svn
commits soon.
I get an error during the compilation process
On Sunday 27 August 2006 20:18, Johannes Sixt wrote:
We've completed the merge. Expect a substantial number of svn commits soon.
The merge is not complete, yet, but almost.
You might be interested to try out OpenGL support, which I've committed to svn
a minute ago. You need the patches that I
Nicolas wrote:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:31:10PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
On Sunday 27 August 2006 20:18, Johannes Sixt wrote:
We've completed the merge. Expect a substantial number of svn commits
soon.
The merge is not complete, yet, but almost.
You might be interested to
We've completed the merge. Expect a substantial number of svn commits soon.
-- Hannes
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
Hi,
Johannes Sixt wrote:
We've completed the merge. Expect a substantial number of svn commits soon.
Cool :) Do you already have some numbers on performance increase?
Stefan
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
Hello Johannes,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 11:10:28PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 22:05, Johannes Sixt wrote:
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:45, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Just a brief notice - Pierre and I are working on the merge.
The merge is progressing slowly, but it
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:45, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Just a brief notice - Pierre and I are working on the merge.
The merge is progressing slowly, but it should pick up pace now that we have
our infrastructure sorted out. I would like to thank Pierre that he's going
through all the hassle to
--- Stefan de Konink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for being dense, but what is the benefit of OpenGL?
Real time performance, because the graphics get hardware
speedups. So if
you look at the new screenshots, you could 'preview' chromakey
I have a notebook with a Radeon ATI and just wanted to know if
it makes sense for me to recompile all to get OpenGL HW
acceleration or if without OpenGL 2.0 it's useless, but it looks
as I put my feet on a hot ground.
Leo
--- Stefan de Konink [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006,
2) nvidia has the best support for non-windoze operating systems. You get
drivers for *unix (Linux, *BSD, so on and so forth), IBM OS/2 and eCom, BeOS
and others! Unlike ATI that has the worst drivers and only support their
windoze drivers.
Who cares about the win32 drivers.
3)
Le 06.07.2006 13:50:53, Jeremiah Benham a écrit :
2) nvidia has the best support for non-windoze operating systems.
You get drivers for *unix (Linux, *BSD, so on and so forth), IBM OS/2
and eCom, BeOS and others! Unlike ATI that has the worst drivers and
only support their windoze drivers.
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 06:50:53 -0500 Jeremiah Benham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Who cares about the win32 drivers.
yeah well i'm a windoze basher as well and bash at them at every chance i get,
but when it comes down to doing business, if the system has ATI drivers even
under windoze, then all
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Dimitrios wrote:
features to their drivers. Sure, their drivers aren't open source (and
anyone working for a similar organization very well understands why) but
who really cares,
I care. Anyone working for a similar organization very well understands
why is not an excuse I
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006, Dimitrios wrote:
thats more than i can say for ATI or any other graphics card company.
not to mention that once a platform is supported then they fully support 2D
and 3D (OpenGL etc). They dont give out a half-made driver that barely
displays your 2D desktop, like ATI
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 15:14:27 +0200 (CEST) Stefan de Konink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ati released the specs to their Rage3D chipset to the community. I think
that is nice too. Since some people are working on an open nvidia
accelerated driver I'm happy to see something is actually going on.
Leonardo,
Here is the list of Cinelerra effects that can use OpenGL (from the changelog at
http://www.heroinewarrior.com/cinelerra_changelog.2.1.txt):
The following effects support OpenGL:brightnesschromakeychromakeyhsvcolorbalancedeinterlacediffkeydissolveflipframes to
On Thu, 6 Jul 2006 09:01:15 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I care. Anyone working for a similar organization very well understands
why is not an excuse I consider acceptable. That same statement could be
used to justify almost anything. I'm not sure how relevant this kind of
Guys,
Sorry for being dense, but what is the benefit of OpenGL?
scott
-- Original message -- From: Computer Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] So... should I move to 2.1 or stick with the "CVS" version? I just spent a lot of time moving to the devel version because 2.0 had some
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for being dense, but what is the benefit of OpenGL?
Real time performance, because the graphics get hardware speedups. So if
you look at the new screenshots, you could 'preview' chromakey scenes
while recording them :)
Stefan
Quoting Johannes Sixt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 03 July 2006 06:46, Jud wrote:
Hi,
As many of you are aware a new Cinelerra released is now available.
Major new feature - OpenGL.
Just a brief notice - Pierre and I are working on the merge.
Please don't commit anything (except maybe
anyone knows if the bug with the faders lines are fixed?Leo,,On 7/3/06, Sylvain Jousse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:Salut Jud, As many of you are aware a new Cinelerra released is now available.
You mean the sources. Let us know whent some one makes the packages(Mandriva, Ubuntu).And thank you
So... should I move to 2.1 or stick with the CVS version? I just
spent a lot of time moving to the devel version because 2.0 had some
problems and missing features I wanted. Is 2.1 based off of a recent
build from the devel version?
Jud wrote:
Hi,
As many of you are aware a new Cinelerra
Leo germani wrote:
anyone knows if the bug with the faders lines are fixed?
Not in the best of manners... HV has just changed the textlabed to a
dropdown list of different ranges, (being 0-100 and -80-6). Toggling
between these two influencing the audio and videos fader ranges.
Personally
Computer Lists wrote:
So... should I move to 2.1 or stick with the "CVS" version? I just
spent a lot of time moving to the devel version because 2.0 had some
problems and missing features I wanted.
Personally, I'd stick with the "SVN" version. What does "lot of time"
mean?
Is 2.1
Pierre,
So... should I move to 2.1 or stick with the CVS version? I just
spent a lot of time moving to the devel version because 2.0 had some
problems and missing features I wanted.
Personally, I'd stick with the SVN version. What does lot of time
mean?
Thanks for the info. By a lot of
Thanks for the info. By a lot of time I meant having to install a ton
of dependencies on Fedora Core 3 to get the latest to work.
Yes, that's always an issue with cinelerra.
Actually, I personally use FC5 and am using the livna, updates, extras
and core yum repository, I seem to recall
Salut Jud,
As many of you are aware a new Cinelerra released is now available.
You mean the sources. Let us know whent some one makes the packages
(Mandriva, Ubuntu).
And thank you guys for the work you make!
Sylvain.
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Hi,
As many of you are aware a new Cinelerra released is now available.
Major new feature - OpenGL.
Thanks
___
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
29 matches
Mail list logo
