Has anyone had success implementing DDR callback using
dialer profile? It worked well with legacy DDR, but not
with dialer profile.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15813t=15813
--
FAQ, list archives, and
The Cisco Press Support Exam Certification Guide was excellent as are the
Boson tests
Good luck.
OSN
Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Once again thanks to the members of this list who have directly and
indirectly helped me.
I just passed the BSCN this
Not sure but when i traded with IQSale everything went smooth.
I was impressed and i am overseas here in Australia and everything arrived
within a week.
-Original Message-
From: Jason [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 13 August 2001 3:59 am
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I'll try again. I'm not saying you're wrong about the scenario as you
describe it, only that you are making many assumptions here that I'm not yet
willing to read into things. MY REPLIES ARE BELOW:
Respectfully, your incorrect. He has a legal class C, 128.5.1.X, which the
OP stated in his
I'm not sure I understand the question entirely. When you say A can't ping
D's loopback, have you tried an extended ping?
:-{)]
-Mark A. Morenz, MS Ed, CCNA, CCAI
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15817t=15796
--
Yes, you may configure the primary as a stand-alone and use it that way
until you are ready to install the failover appliance. I have done this a
couple of times. I have had a couple of installs where we had to use the
failover as a single primary for a short time.
THT,
MikeN
Magdy H. Ibrahim
no logging console
:-{)]
Mark A. Morenz, MS ED, CCNA, CCAI
p.s. you can also control what level of debug messages you receive, but to
just get rid of them, use the above command.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15818t=15789
From global configuration: no logging console
HTH,
MikeN
ahmadbilal wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi all,
I get lot of console messages when i connect to router cause of link
up/down
,due to this i have to wait a long time to trouble shoot and even console
stops responding
sorry
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15821t=15821
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so I'm late. so sue me ;-
last Friday while I was in the office I got to chatting with one of the
other SE's. He had a problem with his home setup and wanted some help. It
was an interesting enough problem that I thought some of you CCNA's, some of
your CCNP candidates, might enjoy taking a
why he gets to the server when telnetting to the router, perhaps the router
is forwarding more ports than just 80, perhaps 23, perhaps more..
Bri
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To:
Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 9:06 PM
Subject: Friday Follies - IP NAT behaviour [7:15822]
Keep in mind that PAgP (Port Aggregation Protocol) is the protocol that sets
up and tears down EtherChannels. Unless the port is configured to shut off
PAgP then you'll still get activity for it since the default setting is
auto. Even on a port that ISN'T configured for EtherChannel. You might
continuing my inquiries into how this stuff really works operationally.
here's what I think: an OSPF packet is created, using an IP header. Protocol
89 is indicated in the protocol field. the source address is the interface
out which the packet is sent. the destination address is 224.0.0.5 or
I'll take a stab.
Going from inside to outside, Nat takes happens before policy routing.
From outside to inside, just the oposite takes place. Without looking at
the configs, This is the best I can come up with.
Good brain teaser though
Tony M.
#6172
- Original Message -
From:
Hamid,
On a switch, the only interface that requires an IP address is the
management interface. The management interface is a virtual interface that
isn't attached to a physical port and is of use only for management - hence
the name. It handles such management protocols as telnet, TFTP, and
Hi all.
You may have noticed me on the air every now and then, before from GoWireless
and now from Touchmark. Well it seems that every company I work for go's
broke. GoWireless did, now touchmark have gone brokeWhen will it end for
all of us.
Advice for you youngsters, work where you are
I am a network engineer and have been assigned a task of implementing access
lists on our routers. I have decided on implementing extended access lists
permitting specific ports and restricting the other unwanted ports,but I am
not sure as to where I should apply the access lists ,on the ethernet
17 matches
Mail list logo