Using DDR callback [7:15813]

2001-08-12 Thread Roy A. Hatchett
Has anyone had success implementing DDR callback using dialer profile? It worked well with legacy DDR, but not with dialer profile. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15813t=15813 -- FAQ, list archives, and

Re: Thanks! [7:15769]

2001-08-12 Thread Oliver Nadalin
The Cisco Press Support Exam Certification Guide was excellent as are the Boson tests Good luck. OSN Ole Drews Jensen wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Once again thanks to the members of this list who have directly and indirectly helped me. I just passed the BSCN this

RE: Bad experiences with IQSale aka Grandstore .. [7:15756]

2001-08-12 Thread Baker, Jason
Not sure but when i traded with IQSale everything went smooth. I was impressed and i am overseas here in Australia and everything arrived within a week. -Original Message- From: Jason [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 13 August 2001 3:59 am To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: One interface-two IPs- NAT? [7:15460]

2001-08-12 Thread Mark Morenz
I'll try again. I'm not saying you're wrong about the scenario as you describe it, only that you are making many assumptions here that I'm not yet willing to read into things. MY REPLIES ARE BELOW: Respectfully, your incorrect. He has a legal class C, 128.5.1.X, which the OP stated in his

RE: BGP question (2) [7:15796]

2001-08-12 Thread Mark Morenz
I'm not sure I understand the question entirely. When you say A can't ping D's loopback, have you tried an extended ping? :-{)] -Mark A. Morenz, MS Ed, CCNA, CCAI Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15817t=15796 --

Re: PIX515UR Question!!! [7:15806]

2001-08-12 Thread MikeN
Yes, you may configure the primary as a stand-alone and use it that way until you are ready to install the failover appliance. I have done this a couple of times. I have had a couple of installs where we had to use the failover as a single primary for a short time. THT, MikeN Magdy H. Ibrahim

Re: Stopping console messages [7:15789]

2001-08-12 Thread Mark Morenz
no logging console :-{)] Mark A. Morenz, MS ED, CCNA, CCAI p.s. you can also control what level of debug messages you receive, but to just get rid of them, use the above command. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15818t=15789

Re: Stopping console messages [7:15787]

2001-08-12 Thread MikeN
From global configuration: no logging console HTH, MikeN ahmadbilal wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Hi all, I get lot of console messages when i connect to router cause of link up/down ,due to this i have to wait a long time to trouble shoot and even console stops responding

test [7:15821]

2001-08-12 Thread CCIEstudy
sorry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=15821t=15821 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Friday Follies - IP NAT behaviour [7:15822]

2001-08-12 Thread Chuck Larrieu
so I'm late. so sue me ;- last Friday while I was in the office I got to chatting with one of the other SE's. He had a problem with his home setup and wanted some help. It was an interesting enough problem that I thought some of you CCNA's, some of your CCNP candidates, might enjoy taking a

Re: Friday Follies - IP NAT behaviour [7:15822]

2001-08-12 Thread Brian
why he gets to the server when telnetting to the router, perhaps the router is forwarding more ports than just 80, perhaps 23, perhaps more.. Bri - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu To: Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 9:06 PM Subject: Friday Follies - IP NAT behaviour [7:15822]

Re: Ports bouncing on a switch - [7:15532]

2001-08-12 Thread Karen E Young
Keep in mind that PAgP (Port Aggregation Protocol) is the protocol that sets up and tears down EtherChannels. Unless the port is configured to shut off PAgP then you'll still get activity for it since the default setting is auto. Even on a port that ISN'T configured for EtherChannel. You might

One more question on OSPF packet behaviour [7:15824]

2001-08-12 Thread Chuck Larrieu
continuing my inquiries into how this stuff really works operationally. here's what I think: an OSPF packet is created, using an IP header. Protocol 89 is indicated in the protocol field. the source address is the interface out which the packet is sent. the destination address is 224.0.0.5 or

Re: Friday Follies - IP NAT behaviour [7:15822]

2001-08-12 Thread Tony Medeiros
I'll take a stab. Going from inside to outside, Nat takes happens before policy routing. From outside to inside, just the oposite takes place. Without looking at the configs, This is the best I can come up with. Good brain teaser though Tony M. #6172 - Original Message - From:

Re: VLAN interface remains SHUTDOWN ! ! ! ! ! ! ! [7:15742]

2001-08-12 Thread Karen E Young
Hamid, On a switch, the only interface that requires an IP address is the management interface. The management interface is a virtual interface that isn't attached to a physical port and is of use only for management - hence the name. It handles such management protocols as telnet, TFTP, and

IT Companies Going Broke [7:15829]

2001-08-12 Thread John Brandis
Hi all. You may have noticed me on the air every now and then, before from GoWireless and now from Touchmark. Well it seems that every company I work for go's broke. GoWireless did, now touchmark have gone brokeWhen will it end for all of us. Advice for you youngsters, work where you are

Access Lists On Routers [7:15830]

2001-08-12 Thread yusuf ujjainwala
I am a network engineer and have been assigned a task of implementing access lists on our routers. I have decided on implementing extended access lists permitting specific ports and restricting the other unwanted ports,but I am not sure as to where I should apply the access lists ,on the ethernet