Re: OT:Groupstudy losing appeal [7:33024]

2002-01-24 Thread juno vtv
Brad, I voiced an observation and asked for a solution. I NEVER said that it was a waste of time participating in this group, nor do I think that I was posting a negative comment. I was asking for a solution from the group members to see if there was something that I or we can do to help. I ag

Re: Redistribution into RIP [7:33138]

2002-01-24 Thread Chuck Larrieu
in that case, use a route map in conjunction with a prefix list. it might get a little hairy if there are lots of routes from different network classes coming in ;-> Chuck ""Aamer Kaleem"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I am sorry i did not mention that RIP int

RE: Help!!!!About IPX [7:32911]

2002-01-24 Thread John Allhiser
Now I know why the 911 operators sometimes get so frustrated. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 7:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: HelpAbout IPX [7:32911] Anybody Help! Message Posted at: h

OT: WAN PRI to T1 [7:33159]

2002-01-24 Thread Chuck Larrieu
saw a design the other day that consisted of ISDN PRI circuits at the host and T1 circuits ate the remotes. According to the person who specified this, there are no end to end problems - that this is standard operating procedure. I am unable to find any written materials on this topic. Anyone don

RE: 2926 VS 5500 Teletone VS Adtran 500 [7:32966]

2002-01-24 Thread Thomas Crowe
When I was putting together my lab, I tried to figure out what would be the best device for ISDN, and maybe voice. I chose the Adtran Atlas 550 even though right now it is the most expensive part of my lab ;-) The advantages of it are: 4 Port ISDN BRI 4 Port FXS 2 port V.35 1 port T-1 The best p

RE: Help!!!!About IPX [7:32911]

2002-01-24 Thread Ken Diliberto
Could the original poster be having problems with an old Sun workstation? Did they spell PIX wrong? Are they trying to get a workstation to talk with a NetWare server? Ken >>> "John Allhiser" 01/24/02 10:07PM >>> Now I know why the 911 operators sometimes get so frustrated. -Original Me

Re: CiscoWorks2000V4:Client Can't Open Web Browser [7:33155]

2002-01-24 Thread Tony Wu
Hi,John Allhiser: I use ip (not servername)to visit management server.The Managment station's IP is in a private IP which belongs to NetworkManagement Vlan1,Vlan1 doesn't have any DNS server.and client use public IP,but have a route to the Managment station. Client Browser doesn't have any

Re: Re: Redistribution into RIP [7:33138]

2002-01-24 Thread John Neiberger
How interesting... it never, ever occurred to me to use prefix lists to filter anything but BGP. Hmm... Talk about needing to think outside of the box, huh? :-) I'm going to have to play with that idea. Thanks, John Get your own "800" numbe

Re: OT: WAN PRI to T1 [7:33159]

2002-01-24 Thread John Neiberger
This one has me stumped too, Chuck. A PRI is physically a T-1, but it's channelized and connects to an ISDN switch. I don't understand how they would connect a PRI on one end to a point- to-point T1 on the other. Unless, that is, the PRI is nailed up all the time, in effect giving them a poi

Re: Catalyst 6000 in CCIE Lab [7:32918]

2002-01-24 Thread Mark Paterson
All, This is no joke, Cisco because of some advanced features, will be testing on some Cat 6K Stuff, My buddy just got back from the exam Last week in San Jose, and yes there was a Cat 6K, I guess this is not to say that the 5K will not be used because it probably will in some cases. Besides I j

NM 2V [7:33166]

2002-01-24 Thread Sujal G. Ajmera
Hi, On a 3640 router, I have put an NM 2V with 2 VIC FXS cards. These voice cards give a problem when they're BOTH in the module in that the router freezes or the voice card doesn't disconnect. Independently they work beautifully. Any thoughts on this? TIA Sujal Message Posted at: http:/

Re: OT: WAN PRI to T1 [7:33159]

2002-01-24 Thread Ozzie Sutcliffe
Atlas 550 Integrated Access Device will do this for you .. Also cost may be a factor as generally PRI 's were cheaper that T1's Maybe also the telco had the PRI'S allready installed >From a PRI perspective the PRI's tend to work better with the telco switches. Seems that the 64 K channel works

Simple Routing question... [7:33168]

2002-01-24 Thread Keith Woodworth
7204 connected via Faste to another layer 3 device. IP on 7204: 64.114.57.2 IP on other device: 64.114.57.1 Subnet mask: 255.255.255.248 One static route on 7204: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 64.114.57.1 7204 is working and fine and reachable. 7204 has an ATM interface (oc3) to a 6260 DSlam. ATM

RE: Catalyst 6000 in CCIE Lab [7:32918]

2002-01-24 Thread Keyur Shah
That is not true. Cat 6k is in some racks. -Keyur Shah- CCIE# 4799 (Security; Routing and Switching) css1,ccna,ccda,scsa,scna,mct,mcse,mcp+i,mcp,cni,mcne,cne,cna Hello Computers "Say Hello to Your Future!" http://www.hellocomputers.com Toll-Free: 1.877.794.3556 -Original Message- From:

Re: NM 2V [7:33166]

2002-01-24 Thread Erick B.
Hi, Plug your modules, IOS, etc into the 2600/3600 memory calc tool and see if you have enough memory to support the modules. http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/MemCalc/mem-calc.pl --- "Sujal G. Ajmera" wrote: > Hi, > > On a 3640 router, I have put an NM 2V with 2 VIC FXS > cards. > > Thes

Re: NM 2V [7:33166]

2002-01-24 Thread Sujal G. Ajmera
I have the required memory - 64mb and the cards were working alright for about 3 months or so. This problem is since 2 weeks only. Thanks, Sujal - Original Message - From: Erick B. To: Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:47 PM Subject: Re: NM 2V [7:33166] > Hi, > > Plug your modules,

Re: VTP Trunking dangerous [7:33097]

2002-01-24 Thread Mike Sweeney
LOL- you have those nice people too? We threatened one guy with a very public stoning after he did something like that. MikeS Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33173&t=33097 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription

Re: NM 2V [7:33166]

2002-01-24 Thread Erick B.
When the problem occurs, does the router reboot itself, output any errors on the console (exception faults, segV, etc)? I'd capture all the errors if there are any, show tech, and open a case. --- "Sujal G. Ajmera" wrote: > Eric: > > I have the required memory - 64mb and the cards were > work

Re: Simple Routing question... [7:33168]

2002-01-24 Thread Mike Taylor
It looks as if the device configured with the 64.114.57.1/29 address has no route back to the 64.114.57.8/29 network. If it were my problem, I'd check to see if a ping from 64.114.57.10 reaches the 64.114.57.1 device and what that device does with it. Good Luck Mike Taylor ""Keith Woodworth""

<    1   2