i believe the first # issued was 1025...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44297&t=44294
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure viol
I thought the 1st one was 1024 (1k). Don't know the most recent.
--Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44298&t=44294
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report m
I used BFQ on the MCSE, and it was perfect. Too Perfect. Right down to the
typos on the MS test itself... It definately contributed to my perfect
record on cert exams, but one must make sure they understand the concepts,
not just memorize the answers.
--Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.grou
I've created the right config on my route but the inside firewall is still
getting the the originaln address not the natted one. Help..
hostname rp-2514X
!
ip nat outside source static 172.16.89.32 171.68.16.5
!
interface Ethernet1
ip address 171.68.192.202 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
n
I think you can do this with Reverse Route Injection. I haven't done it
before but from what I gather you inject a route for the Client's network
into the concentrator's route table. Therefore other client's would have a
route to that client's network. Look into it. You configure it under
Conf
That config is taken verbatim from CCO. The problem has to be elsewhere.
Can you explain what exactly you are doing and how you know it's not
working? What, for instance, do you get from the "show ip nat translation"
command?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44
As far as I know, CCIE certification is not related to CCNP or any other
certification tracks. You don't have to pass any of CCNP exams.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44303&t=44293
--
FAQ, list archives, and subsc
I've configured a nat on a Cisco but can't seem to get the natting to work.
Below is the config file
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 10.10.11.1 255.255.255.252
ip nat inside
speed auto
full-duplex
interface Serial0/1
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
ip nat outside
no keep
If there is a boot system command in the config file, and that command
doesn't list a network boot, then the router will NOT boot from network. If
the file in the flash is corrupted, it will go ROM right away. Cisco web
site has a nice diagram that shows all possible combinations.
Message Posted
I don't think either other response actually answered the question.
And the answer is: it depends.
If you are in an area of the US with modern telephone switching
equipment (i.e. almost all of it), I believe the answer is "No, it will make
no difference."
Should you find yourself
Folks while studying for the CCIE lab I was working on the VOIP portion. I
was configuring VOFR and according to Caslow 2nd edition, page 781 he states:
NOTE: the configuration above will support a Voice over Frame-Relay service
only. It does not support both Voice and Data over Frame-Relay.
D
11 matches
Mail list logo