Re: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-08 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > > At 10:46 PM + 7/8/03, Zsombor Papp wrote: > >The LSA will be fragmented at the IP layer. > > Do you know for certain this is what Cisco's implementation > does? > The OSPF code is aware of the MTU and can build OSPF packets > for it. > I don't think you're reall

Re: Movie [7:72049]

2003-07-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please see the attached zip file for details. [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of your_details.zip] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72049&t=72049 -- FAQ, list arc

Re: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-08 Thread Zsombor Papp
The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA that is larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200 interfaces). I can't see how such an LSA could be divided into multiple OSPF messages so the only logical (implementation independent) solution seems to be to fr

Re: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-08 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 10:46 PM + 7/8/03, Zsombor Papp wrote: >The LSA will be fragmented at the IP layer. Do you know for certain this is what Cisco's implementation does? The OSPF code is aware of the MTU and can build OSPF packets for it. I don't think you're really going to simplify it by relieving it of t

Re: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-08 Thread Zsombor Papp
The LSA will be fragmented at the IP layer. Thanks, Zsombor At 11:39 AM 7/8/2003 +, hebn wrote: >layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes. >how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed 1500 >bytes(more than 122 links in one area)? Message Posted at: http://www.groups

RE: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-08 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 9:38 PM + 7/8/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: >hebn wrote: >> >> hello,everyone: > >> OSPF use raw socket (datagram) to communicate with peers. In > > general, layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes. I'm not sure I'd call it a strict datagram protocol. In some cases, it's acknowl

RE: OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-08 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
hebn wrote: > > hello,everyone: >OSPF use raw socket (datagram) to communicate with peers. In > general, layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes. >how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed > 1500 bytes(more than 122 links in one area)? Well, I don't have a definite a

Re: ISDN Port goes to Deactivated mode [7:72022]

2003-07-08 Thread ericbrouwers
Probably layer 1 and 2 are deactivated by the Telco. It's better to use a dialer interface as backup of a serial line. Then L1/2 stays up. Refer to other ISDN thread as well. If you don't want to do that, try to change the TEI negotiation. Cisco's default is TEI negotiation when the router is powe

RE: Maximum segment size in TCP [7:72030]

2003-07-08 Thread mccloud mike
I have seen a similar issue with a VPN connection. The problem was caused when an NT admin wrote a batch file that did a large FTP across the link every 45 minutes. The large volume of traffic caused the router cpu to spike due to the encryp/decryp load… hence slow performance. I would try to chec

Re: ISDN case... [7:72017]

2003-07-08 Thread ericbrouwers
Hi Heiman, You won't get a bill: there won't be any ISDN layer 3 call: only your ISDN bearer, so layer 1/2 will come up. Only when your serial goes down, an ISDN call will be made and then you have to pay. Eric - Original Message - From: "H T" To: Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:05 PM S

RE: cisco back to back cable [7:71992]

2003-07-08 Thread DeVoe, Charles (PKI)
Perhaps a copy of the configs would be helpful here. -Original Message- From: KW S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 12:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cisco back to back cable [7:71992] Dear All I have a 2501 and 2505 and I am trying to set up a homelab..These

RE: CCDP requirements: pointless to do CID if you don' [7:72027]

2003-07-08 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
MCMORDIE Shane (BMB) wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm aiming at CCDP but I don't have BCRAN. Am I correct in > thinking > that there is no point in me registering for CID before > registration > finally ends on July 25th - because to go this route to CCDP, > BCRAN is > also needed - but is no longer avai

Re: HSRP and IPSEC VPN [7:72034]

2003-07-08 Thread MADMAN
If router A anb B share an ethernet then sure HSRP was designed exactly for this scenerio Dave Dain Deutschman wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know if HSRP would be appropriate in the following scenario? > > ROUTERA with T1 to corporate office > > ROUTERB with IPSEC VPN to Corporate only used

Re: HSRP and IPSEC VPN [7:72034]

2003-07-08 Thread Dain Deutschman
..that's what I thought...just needed a sanity check! Thanks! ""MADMAN"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > If router A anb B share an ethernet then sure HSRP was designed > exactly for this scenerio > >Dave > > Dain Deutschman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Does anyone know if HSRP would be

HSRP and IPSEC VPN [7:72034]

2003-07-08 Thread Dain Deutschman
Hi, Does anyone know if HSRP would be appropriate in the following scenario? ROUTERA with T1 to corporate office ROUTERB with IPSEC VPN to Corporate only used as a backup path in case the T1 on ROUTERA fails Is there any reason that this will not work or has anyone had experience with this typ

RE: ISDN Port goes to Deactivated mode [7:72022]

2003-07-08 Thread George Murage
I have experienced the same problem and would really like to see what the others have to say. While testing, I put my router with a BRI-1B-S/T card behind a PBX with an NTI card and the problem vanished. This led me to believe that the problem has something to do with the telco. I *think* the

RE: Maximum segment size in TCP [7:72030]

2003-07-08 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
A host uses the TCP maximum segment size option to specify the max size of TCP segments (packets) that it can accept. In the case where you have the slow response time, the mainframe is saying that its max segment size is 4056 bytes, which means that it can accept packets of that size (with that mu

RE: CCDP requirements: pointless to do CID if you don't already [7:72032]

2003-07-08 Thread George Murage
Hi, You do not need BCRAN to be CCNP. Just BSCI, Switching and CID. I am also trying to beat the 25th July deadline! Please see: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/learning/le3/le2/le37/le5/learning_certification_ type_home.html Thanks and regards George Murage -Original Message- From: MCMO

Re: New MPLS book [7:72029]

2003-07-08 Thread AK
the first edition whould be enough to pass the exam, but u will see u will want to get the new book, cause it's a very interesting subject it's (the futur of networking)... ""Muhtari Adanan"" a icrit dans le message de news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > is it worth getting the new MPLS book (MPLS and VP

Maximum segment size in TCP [7:72030]

2003-07-08 Thread kuma kk
Hello group, I am facing slow response issue when connecting to Mainframe. This is how my connectivity goes [EMAIL PROTECTED] A ---> FrameRelay(WAN) --> Location B ---> Site to Site VPN (T1) --> [EMAIL PROTECTED] C I have captured the packet using ethereal and found that Source PC TCP Maximum

New MPLS book [7:72029]

2003-07-08 Thread Muhtari Adanan
is it worth getting the new MPLS book (MPLS and VPN Architectures, Volume II by Ivan & Jim) for the CCIE C&S exams? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72029&t=72029 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: htt

Re: ISDN Port goes to Deactivated mode [7:72022]

2003-07-08 Thread H T
Hi, can you show us your running config of both sides, so we can know where would be the problem? cheers, Heiman. ""Mr piyush shah"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dear all > I am having 128 kbps Leased Line with ISDN backup.As > the Link goes Down ,ISDN should trigger,however in m

CCDP requirements: pointless to do CID if you don't already [7:72027]

2003-07-08 Thread MCMORDIE Shane (BMB)
Hi, I'm aiming at CCDP but I don't have BCRAN. Am I correct in thinking that there is no point in me registering for CID before registration finally ends on July 25th - because to go this route to CCDP, BCRAN is also needed - but is no longer available? Therefore better for me to forget CID and

Good news and bad news [7:72026]

2003-07-08 Thread annlee
I recommend taking a look at this article http://www.idg.net/ic_1325908_9677_1-5044.html There is good news and bad news built into it. The bad news first: the tech jobs that many of us in North America used to enter the IT world -- help desk, small networks -- are consolidating and moving oversea

Re: ISDN case... [7:72017]

2003-07-08 Thread H T
Hi Eric, Thanks for what you wrote... I want the BRI just for a back up... so the line should stay down all the time when every thing is normal. I want the BRI come up only once the serial go down " in this way we get small bill" :) how about the routing section ? did you had a look at? cheers,

Re: ISDN Port goes to Deactivated mode [7:72022]

2003-07-08 Thread Mr piyush shah
Dear all I am having 128 kbps Leased Line with ISDN backup.As the Link goes Down ,ISDN should trigger,however in my case the ISDN link does not come up and goes to deactivated mode.What could be the problem .I have seen that upon removing the ISDN link and inserting back it gives the status as ACTI

OSPF max Router-LSA links [7:72024]

2003-07-08 Thread hebn9999
layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes. how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed 1500 bytes(more than 122 links in one area)? __ === [EMAIL PROTECTED] (http://bizsite.sina.com.

Re: ISDN case... [7:72017]

2003-07-08 Thread ericbrouwers
This is normal behaviour: if you configure BRI as backup, it will go in standby mode and line protocol goes down. You can avoid this by configuring a dialer interface as backup. Then the dialer interface will go in standby mode, but the BRI stays up!! This is preferred since: 1. some Telco's will l

Re: ISDN case... [7:72017]

2003-07-08 Thread H T
Hi, This is the detail configuration for both routers LDS# LDS#show run Building configuration... Current configuration : 2939 bytes ! version 12.2 service timestamps debug datetime msec localtime service timestamps log datetime msec localtime service password-encryption service compress-config !

Re: ISDN Port goes to Deactivated mode [7:72023]

2003-07-08 Thread Mr piyush shah
Dear all I am having 128 kbps Leased Line with ISDN backup.As the Link goes Down ,ISDN should trigger,however in my case the ISDN link does not come up and goes to deactivated mode.What could be the problem .I have seen that upon removing the ISDN link and inserting back it gives the status as ACTI

RE: protocol analyzer [7:72018]

2003-07-08 Thread Dom
You may find the two sites listed at the bottom of http://www.sysdom.org/html/web_links.htm To be of some use. Best regards, Dom Stocqueler SysDom Technologies === IMPORTANT: This email is intended for the use of the

protocol analyzer [7:72018]

2003-07-08 Thread fdfdfdfd fdfdfdf
someone please tell me web sites about how to understand the outputs of protocol analyzer. any help will be appreciated! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=72018&t=72018 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: ht

RE: Cisco catalyst 3548 and Radius [7:71991]

2003-07-08 Thread Andrew Larkins
those commands are only there after you enable aaa new model. -Original Message- From: Robert Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 07 July 2003 18:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cisco catalyst 3548 and Radius [7:71991] Hi all, I am configuring Radius on a cat 3548 and I do not have

ISDN case... [7:72017]

2003-07-08 Thread H T
Hi all, I have a problem with my ISDN back up link... the interface in STANDBY mode. TBRS#sho inter bri0 BRI0 is standby mode, line protocol is down Hardware is PQUICC BRI Description: Dialer to Lovisenberg Internet address is 172.21.14.1/24 MTU 1500 bytes, BW 64 Kbit, DLY 2 usec,

RE: Query on MGX8850 [7:71702]

2003-07-08 Thread Divakaran Ullampuzhamana
Hi, My answers inline Thanks and Regards Diva- "Vikram JeetSingh" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]