Perhaps the entire group doesn't need to see all the me too responses???
At 01:18 AM 09/05/2001 -0400, Vishal Punjabi wrote:
Me too
Vishal
-Original Message-
From: samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: how to
Keep in mind also that fast switching is probably enabled on your RSM,
which will not allow you to see most packets routed through the router with
commands such as 'debug ip packet'.
-brad
At 04:17 PM 05/18/2001 -0400, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
My guess it that the debug ip udp command
Please don't post questions such as this on this list. This is a clear
no-no. I don't know what you expect the group to do with these. Tell you
the answers?
At 03:23 AM 05/13/2001 -0400, Victim wrote:
ciex1.2.1
Which three statements about cisco's implementation of IP routing are true
Look it up on CCO. The answer is easy to find.
At 03:26 AM 05/13/2001 -0400, Victim wrote:
Hello,
you can perform extended ping at which mode ( , #, (config)) ??
Also, what is the difference between extended ping and normal ping?
Thanks!
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
I don't want to lookup up the CLI options for the EIGRP default-metric
command, but I can tell you that ip unnumbered will only work on
point-to-point interfaces.
-brad
At 12:30 AM 04/11/2001 -0400, Frank Mendoza wrote:
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
Hi
Mr. Johnson,
I do believe you will find most of us on this list are concerned with the
NDA. I can't imagine an inquiry such as yours will prompt positive response.
-brad
At 08:29 PM 04/01/2001 -0500, mike johnson wrote:
hello,
Wondering if anyone has any real CCIE lab scenarios to trade?
failed that thing!
take care,
brad
---
Brad Beck
Network Engineer
Macromedia, Inc.
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
Brad Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED]@groupstudy.com
10/30/2000 11:41 PM
Please respond to Brad Beck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lists Wizard [EMAIL PROTECTED], "'Cisco group study'"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Escape sequence
control-shift-6
control-shift-6 then x
-b
At 03:26 PM 10/29/00 -0700, Lists Wizard wrote:
Hello,
what is the escape sequence if I want to stop the router from traceing the
path to a destination ? I have tried many keyboard sequences but I failed.
Thanks
Rover
Router#trace 10.1.38.227
Type escape sequence to
3com acutally gives away a much nicer win32 tftp/syslog client/server. I
actually saw this running on a machine at Cisco in San Jose, and the
employee who was using it pointed me to the URL.
It can be found here:
http://support.3com.com/infodeli/swlib/utilities_for_windows_32_bit.htm
-Brad
It seems rather silly to me that a CCIE would suggest that a Sun box would
"flood the wire with excessive SMB traffic". I'm not saying this rules
this man out of being CCIE, just that the diagnoses is a poor one coming
from anyone, even if they don't know about FW1.
-Brad
At 12:54 PM 10/23/00
I'm pretty sure the questions aren't all worth an equal number of points.
I could be wrong though.
-Brad
At 07:13 PM 10/21/00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Group,
I always wondered when taking my tests what they meant when they
said that there would be a 300/1000 scale. Then
I think this topic has come and gone way too many times to be of any use on
this list. Please take this elsewhere so that those of us who appreciate
this list don't get tired of it because of debates like this one continue
to grind on.
Thank you in advance,
Brad
At 01:54 PM 10/18/00 -0400,
I agree that Ciscopress books are better than other publishers I've seen.
When I was studying for CCNA I bought a book by Global Knowledge titled
"CCNA test yourself practice exams". This book was terrible. Many, many
errors. The Cisco books I've used seem very well put together and at least
I've heard a couple windows people at my company talk about how the
plug/play features of Win2K go so far as poke at the serial port to check
for devices such as UPS. I suppose some characters could be sent to the
console which could crash the box Just a thought..
-Brad
At 10:45 AM
A blade is produced for the 6509 which provides in-line power for the Cisco
VoIP phone.
-Brad
At 07:54 PM 9/13/00 -0700, Dennis Laganiere wrote:
I can't seem to find on the www.cisco.com site which switches have inline
power, in otherwords, can power the VoIP phones. Can anybody let me know
This sounds more like the distinction between multimode and single mode fiber.
-Brad
At 09:04 AM 9/6/00 -0400, Fomes Iain wrote:
this is a misconception.
Dark fiber or Dark fibre as we can it here in England.God save the Queen an
all that is actually a fibre based product that enables
Hi there,
The tftp protocol performs reliability checking on its' own in the form of
a CRC check on transfered files. You are correct in that UDP is an
unreliable protocol.
-Brad
At 01:43 PM 6/20/00 +0800, BB wrote:
HI,
I just want to ask if it is a reliable transfer protocol.
UDP
Actually I'm having this problem. I remember the list admin mentioning
some filter scripts he was working on. I suspect that these filters are
not functioning correctly.
-Brad
At 08:47 PM 6/8/00 +0200, ElephantChild wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, John Neiberger wrote:
For two of my recent
Hi,
I know that if I change the global pool in any way or add/delete static
translations, I will experience random problems in translations. These
problems can occur within the the range of the global pool, as well as the
range for my static mappings. The only way I've found to work around
That amount of money is not a lot for the Peninsula or South Bay...
-Brad
At 04:49 PM 6/4/00 -0700, Sam Adams wrote:
3com in Milpitas pays that much? Dang..
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Ryan Ward
Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2000 1:25 PM
I beleive it's ten by default in OSPF, not sure about EIGRP.
-Brad CCNA
At 01:40 PM 5/28/00 +0800, Jacques Lee wrote:
Dear all,
I'm a little bit confused with the update time interval for hello
packets sent in OSPF and EIGRP. by default, is it 10s or 5s ?
Thanks
--
¨Ó¦Û¸t¦ã¦ÌÀs¬Pªº¤p©ú©ú¶W¤H
22 matches
Mail list logo
