No it hasn't. It's always been like that, it's a problem with the way whois
works. Do a whois on aol.com...
Check out:
www.securiteam.com/securitynews/Spoofing_whois_information__Was__Is_Microsof
t_com_safe_.html
for more info.
Greg
- Original Message -
From: "Allen May" <[EMAIL PROTECT
You need to do a 'no int s0/0.2' write mem, reload, then put it back in as a
point-to-point. IOS won't let you change the link type, and you can't just
take the sub-int out and put it back in, you have to reload the router then
re-add it.
Greg
- Original Message -
From: "les flack" <[EMA
Hello --
I have some static NAT translating going on in my lab, and if I am "inside"
and try to telnet to the "outside" IP address of a machine, I get connection
refused. Telnetting to the "inside" IP address of the machine works. I do
have
an inbound access list on the "outside" interface, but i
your internal systems fine
>
> Internal 2 External address of Internal system - um, no.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> TJ
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Smythe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:10
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: NAT question [
I don't think it's officially supported on win2k yet.
Greg
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2000 11:09 AM
Subject: Ciscoworks on Win2000
I'm having trouble installing the demo of Ciscoworks for Windows onto
Windows 2000 Ad
Hello --
Has anyone done this before? I'm trying to get a VPN connection to work over
NAT. I see the translation happening, but my PC gets as far as "verifying
username/pass" and then it errors out saying the server didn't respond
(timeout).
show ip nat tra:
tcp 3.3.3.3:1056 102.153.102.251:105
Tried that already. Only info I found on there is configuring a PIX firewall
VPN tunnel. Searching the CCO is a major pain; you get soo many unrelated
hits..
Greg
- Original Message -
From: "Balharek, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Smythe" <[EMAIL P
through. It's a security feature.
Ric
- Original Message -
From: "Balharek, Peter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Smythe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2000 4:31 PM
Subject: RE: VPN through NAT
> Try a crazy
se ). I'll let the list
know what they say. My case was just dispatched to a tech.
Greg
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg Smythe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ric Messier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAI
I talked to a cisco tech today. Looks like I can't do it. It seems that the
GRE protocol is in Layer 3 which won't work when doing NAT (well PAT because
I'm doing NAT overload). So I would have to have an external IP address for
every machine that I want to PPTP VPN out to my other machine so that
The price that Cisco is charging for 16mb dram sticks is outrageous. $725
for the MEM3620-16D!! I was looking on cisco's website and I found this:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/cisco/mkt/access/3600/prodlit/544_pp.htm
It looks like I can use a standard EDO 8x32 60ns 16MB stick and it'll wor
11 matches
Mail list logo
