Re: Load Balancing Advice

2001-02-08 Thread Mike Fountain
Running OSPF should work fine. That is how we do a majority of our load balancing. Only thing to make sure of is that if the circuit goes down your default route goes away so you don't keep advertising it to the Cat5K. - Original Message - From: "Yonkerbonk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EM

Re: 7206 and controller

2001-02-13 Thread Mike Fountain
This is a channelized T1 card. The controller command tells the router some basic csu/dsu commands, and also which time-slots on that T1 are in similar channels. In this one all 24 timeslots (1-24) are in the same channel group, and the guy that configured it decided to call that group number 23

re: Cisco Lab Tax Write Off

2001-02-15 Thread Mike Fountain
I've always claimed mine. Along with any books and the cost of taking the exams. I use Turbo Tax and claim it under "Work-Related Expenses" as an "education" expense. Here is what 'turbo tax' has been telling me -> "You can deduct expenses for education - even though it may lead to a degree if

Re: IOS file name

2001-02-22 Thread Mike Fountain
Try this link -> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/620/1.html - Original Message - From: "Will Guan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 8:49 PM Subject: IOS file name > Hello everyone: > Who can tell me where I can g

Re: A different Wildcard Mask [1:2082]

2001-02-23 Thread Mike Fountain
Try this -> Look at the bits in the last octet 96 = 0110 127 = 0111 The common bits are the first three, so you want to mask it like this -> 0001 or, 31 65 = 0101 95 = 0101 The common bits are again the first bits, so again the mask is -> 0001 or 31 So, your list

Re: Logs for the circuits Up/dpwn time

2001-03-19 Thread Mike Fountain
A couple of things you will need to do - 1) Set up NTP in your router to get the correct time from a neighboring router, or on the internet. Do a search on Cisco's for NTP and you will get several pages explaining what it is and how to configure it 2) Use the command "logging buffered" to sa

Re: Cisco's TFTP Program

2000-12-30 Thread Mike Fountain
There is a flaky bug in their software that sometimes occurs, sometimes doesn't. Try going into the option and turn off logging and displaying download progress ((I don't have it on this PC so I can't remember the exact options)) and then it should work ok. hope that helps - Original Mess

Re: How to check IDB?

2001-01-07 Thread Mike Fountain
I think it is also dependant on the router as well as the IOS version. = IIRC a 7200 running 12.0 will support 3000 IDB Probably the best way to find out is to ask a Cisco SE. They have = access to web pages and information that isn't posted on the public = site. That is how we found the limit

Re: Multicast Group Join???

2001-01-19 Thread Mike Fountain
It is driven by the application. The application decides it wants to work by multicasting packets or receiving multicast packets, so it reports it wants to join multicast group X where X is a multicast IP that was either coded into it, or configured by the user. If you have two users with the sa

Re: CEF/dCEF [7:7330]

2001-06-06 Thread Mike Fountain
We use CEF on some of our 2600s so that we can do Packet-by-Packet loadbalancing without having to process-switch every packet and burn up the CPU - Original Message - From: "West, Karl" To: Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 9:38 AM Subject: CEF/dCEF [7:7330] > To all: > > I understand

Re: CEF/dCEF [7:7330]

2001-06-06 Thread Mike Fountain
and I have not seen any performance > difference. Have you? > > -Original Message- > From: Mike Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:48 AM > To: West, Karl; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: CEF/dCEF [7:7330] > > > We use CEF o

Re: CEF/dCEF [7:7330]

2001-06-06 Thread Mike Fountain
conversation? > > i.e. is your traffic balance 50-50 ( for two lines )? Or some other figure, > because traffic for particular destinations is dent out particular links due > to the route caching? > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt

Re: CEF/dCEF [7:7330]

2001-06-07 Thread Mike Fountain
y. I'll probably have to ask our Cisco SE why the 'load-balance per-packet' doesn't seem to be working like we would expect it to. > -Original Message- > From: Mike Fountain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: 7206 IPSec [7:7825]

2001-06-09 Thread Mike Fountain
12.2.2T Early Deployment or 12.2.1a Major Release - Original Message - From: "John" To: Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 5:38 AM Subject: 7206 IPSec [7:7825] > Anyone knows the latest shipping version of 7206 IPSec? > > Thanks, > John Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.co

RE: frame relay DLCIs [7:8625]

2001-06-14 Thread Mike Fountain
If it is a multi-point interface you can have more then one DLCI configured. The DLCI configured in the router is actually the DLCI for the remote end that the Frame-Relay switch would be telling the router about. The router doesn't really care what it's local DLCI is, only what the remote DLCIs

Re: HSRP [7:10428]

2001-06-29 Thread Mike Fountain
Yes, with HSRP all traffic will go the primary router and the second would be idle. You can do some HSRP loadbalancing by having two physical routers and then each of them configured with two HSRP addresses. One is primary for one HSRP address and secondary for the other and router two is second

Re: Help with frame-relay pvc status [7:33793]

2002-01-30 Thread Mike Fountain
Deleted means the PVC is configured in your router, but not in your service provider's network - the router is not recieving LMI about that DLCI. In order to get it to go active you are going to have get your provider to finish provisioning it. - Original Message - From: "Stephane Wanto

Re: ipsec set up [7:32130]

2002-01-16 Thread Mike Fountain
Well, one thing I notice is that your map is called "vpnmap" but your interface calls "ourvpnmap" and your transform set name is SETNAME, but your map calls for form0 - (although it may just be a typo on the example and not in the router) If you only have one ethernet, how are you specifying fas

Re: Stateful NAT Failover [7:57857]

2002-11-22 Thread Mike Fountain
I've seen some stuff on Cisco, but it has only been for the 7500, 1, and 12000 series routers. I haven't read too closely, but it may only be for failover for RPs within the same chassis. It also seems to require the 12.0(22)S code, I'm not sure where that train was rolled into the 12.1 or 12