terested to know what platforms are using MS code.
- Sean
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Leeb-Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAT'S RULE!!! -- actual Cisco stuff mentioned [7:34392]
Not only am I from CA,
Dang it, Steven, you had me thinking that this was a message about Port
Address Translation! :-D
Next time please spell out the team name. Or pick another team! The
Raiders were robbed, robbed, I say!
Steven A. Ridder 02/03/2002 8:48:08 PM
the refs just handed us
the game. There still were some major playing and feats that we had to make
to get us to where we got in that game.
Steve
Patricia Leeb-Hart wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Dang it, Steven, you had me thinking that this was a message ab
Thanks, Brian, for the sound advice. I've just finished Semester 4 (though
I got my CCNA a couple of months ago) and look forward to Sem. 5. As I've
stated before, I'm going the Academy route for cost reasons, hands-on with
an extensive lab but also to benefit from the interaction between other
developing between us. I am sure it will return my affection.:)
Happy Holidays Everyone,
Prof. Tom Lisa, CCAI
Community College of Southern Nevada
Cisco Regional Networking Academy
Patricia Leeb-Hart wrote:
Thanks, Brian, for the sound advice. I've just finished Semester 4 (though
I got my CCNA
Hmmm, Jeff, sorry to hear you're disappointment. I won't be able to make a
judgement yet myself; sounds like you have much more Unix experience than I
do (which is mainly shell scripting and basic user administration). From
what I've seen it's extremely basic but it'll be useful for students
We feel yore pain ...but maybe the title of your post should be changed to
I Hate Vendors Who Are Too Damn Lazy To Fix a Stupid Flaw That's Probably
Induced Ulcers in More Than One Engineer
'course it loses a little punch then
MADMAN 12/18/2001 3:10:04 PM
Or more generally remote access
Bruce, I really wish you lived in the S.F. Bay Area!! And I hope that other
CCSIs follow your lead.
(BTW, my husband's gearing up to do something similar to this but in PC
tech.)
Bruce Evry 11/30/01 10:06:45 AM
Hello,
I am a Cisco Instructor and have been toying with the idea of
Oh, my. One's head reels!
Phil Barker 11/14/2001 12:55:16 PM
Just been reading the above RFC. To quote
Checksum is the 16-bit one's complement of the one's
complement sum of a pseudo header of information from
the IP header, the UDP header, and the data, padded
with zero octets at the end
The -r deletes all files and subdirectories at and below the point at which
rm is invoked / analogous to deltree but without prompting. Haven't seen
the f used before...
Priscilla Oppenheimer 10/03/01 10:27AM
Hee hee. That's very funny. I'm going to ask a dumb question though. I know
what
Hamid,
Don't know if you've already seen this, but check out
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/50.shtml#cisco2600
From what I see on this page, it would appear that a FastEthernet port is
required for interVLAN routing.
BTW, group, I noticed in the configuration section of this page that
goes
into forwarding mode. If a loop did exist the link would transition to
blocking.
-Original Message-
From: Patricia Leeb-Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problem Using external routers to route between VLANs
Message-
From: Patricia Leeb-Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Problem Using external routers to route between VLANs
[7:17166]
Thanks for clearing this up! This comes as a tremendous a
relief
Thanks for sharing this, John! This in fact is how my shop has our servers
and branches set up. I'm so used to it I never thought to bring it up in
this forumit's good to have the perspective of others.
John Hardman 08/10/01 06:58PM
Hi All...
/snipped-
When
Paul, it's pretty much up to you. But, since you ask ...I like the hyphens
myself as it would be easy to edit the return address back to proper format.
Paul Borghese 07/30/01 10:03AM
I had a suggestion this morning to change the format of the return address
in the e-mail. This will
Ray,
I'm not sure what you mean when you state that if done that with a PC the
interface would not work...Let's take it to mean that you would try to ping
an address assigned to PC's network interface. Depends on what the
interface is comprised of. E.g, Windows 9x, NT and 2k and Linux (hey,
I feel your pain...unfamiliar hardware is a bitch.
Sounds like you have bad RAM or bad EPROM. Try this link for hardware
installation / config info:
http://www.cisco.com/pcgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_view.pl?p=Hardware:2500s=Hardware_Info#Hardware_Installation_%26_Configuration
beware of line
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: IPX Network addresses [7:11990]
Interesting. Why would it generate network numbers, though? Shouldn't
network numbers be manually configured?
Priscilla
At 04:11 PM 7/11/01, Patricia Leeb-Hart wrote:
I finally
Oh, God, too funny! Makes me want to run out and re-rent the video...
Robert Fowler 07/10/01 01:24PM
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=12343t=11794
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
David, try this URL
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/111/9.html
It's the Novell SAP service list. Pretty comprehensive but may not include
some stuff written for NetWare 5 (which usually runs native IP anyway but
can also has an IPX compatibility mode that may put out SAPs).
HTH
David L
I finally feel qualified to comment on a question on this list (having
worked with NetWare for the past 6 years)
The addresses you're seeing are generated automatically. What's happening
here is that the new server has every single Ethernet frame type loaded, and
as a result is using different
would it generate network numbers, though? Shouldn't
network numbers be manually configured?
Priscilla
At 04:11 PM 7/11/01, Patricia Leeb-Hart wrote:
I finally feel qualified to comment on a question on this list (having
worked with NetWare for the past 6 years)
The addresses you're seeing
No, no eval available, but there are pretty good screen shots on the Web
site, yeah, not the same, I know.
My only experience with RouterSim has been with v3, so I can't compare
between 2 and 3. However, I found it very useful in studying for the CCNA
and I think it helped tremendously in
23 matches
Mail list logo
