RE: ISS Real Secure Vs Cisco IDS [7:63461]

2003-02-23 Thread Sean Kim
Thank you very much everybody. I think I have received some valuable info/background to get myself started. Sean Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63608&t=63461 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://

RE: Ping ethernet interface with datagram over 150 [7:63085]

2003-02-20 Thread Sean Kim
d be sending pings with the > Don't Fragment bit set, in which case it would fail, if there > really is an MTU issue. > > See additional comment below. > > Sean Kim wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > My company has this 3rd party connection through ATM.

ISS Real Secure Vs Cisco IDS [7:63461]

2003-02-20 Thread Sean Kim
me up with what the differences are between them, and which one is better suited for our network. Can anyone voice their opinion about these two IDS? Thanks, Sean Kim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63461&t=63461 -

Re: Ping ethernet interface with datagram over 150 [7:63085]

2003-02-16 Thread Sean Kim
s. When doing a ping from the > router, if using ATM interface as source then it is > going across ATM as 1600 bytes. > > --- Sean Kim wrote: > > Hello Erick, > > > > If that's the case, than wouldn't I have problem > > pinging any nodes (with > &g

Re: Ping ethernet interface with datagram over 150 [7:63085]

2003-02-15 Thread Sean Kim
Sean Erick B. wrote: > > The ATM connection (provider) is probably limiting > payload size to 1500. They may doing some form of > traffic policing - common these days. Ethernet LAN MTU > is 1500 so there really isn't a need to send greater > than that across ATM in this case

Re: Ping ethernet interface with datagram over 150 [7:63085]

2003-02-15 Thread Sean Kim
ssing something, please let me know. Thank. Sean KimM.C. van den Bovenkamp wrote: > > Sean Kim wrote: > > > There isn't any problem with connection of performance. But > I am very > > curious about why this is happening. > > Does anybody have any idea why this wou

Ping ethernet interface with datagram over 1500 [7:63085]

2003-02-14 Thread Sean Kim
anybody have any idea why this would happen? Or can anybody give me a clue as to how to approach this problem? Thank you in advance. Sean Kim Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63085&t=63085 -- FA

Re: OSPF with Riverstone.(RS3000) [7:37523]

2002-03-07 Thread Sean Kim
d then redistribute > connected networks for those interfaces you don't want hellos sent on, or > are there just too many interfaces to make adding only certain ones to the > backbone efficient? > > > ~-Original Message- > ~From: Sean Kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

Re: OSPF with Riverstone.(RS3000) [7:37523]

2002-03-07 Thread Sean Kim
Thank you for your feed back Peter, I also tried to add ALL the interface by using below command ospf add interface all to-area backbone And then tried to set some of the interfaces passive, individually. ospf set interface xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx passive but this failed, so I tried using in

OSPF with Riverstone.(RS3000) [7:37523]

2002-03-06 Thread Sean Kim
Hello everybody, I know this doesn`t have much to do with Cisco, but if anyone would like to share his/her knowledge, I would be very grateful. Has anyone worked with Riverstone RS3000 before? I have set up OSPF backbone area on RS 3000, ospf create area backbone Then I wanted all the ports to