RE: DLCI Prioritization [7:71428]

ose the primary DLCI, the subinterface goes down and you lose all traffic. " What does the second point mean...?? Thanks Srivathsan -Original Message- From: ericbrouwers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 4:36 PM To: Srivathsan Ananthachari Subject: Re: DLC

Channel Bonding [7:71519]

Can the group please let me know what channel bonding is and how does it compare with multilinking / interleaving ?? TIA/Srivathsan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71519&t=71519 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscri

RE: BGP routes [7:71442]

Hi, Full Routes : That's for your router to maintain anyAS-to-anyAS routing info . If you recv full routes from your ISP then it's more of a disadvantage / overhead . That's so because you'll have to have loads of RAM and CPU power in your ROUTER connecting to the ISP to maintain those routing tab

RE: Subinterfaces [7:71421]

If it's possible to assign a network address ( IP / IPX viz., ) to the FR sub-interface why not be able to specify encap as well..?? I hope I'm not draggin it.../ Srivathsan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mwalie W Sent: Thursday, June 26

DLCI Prioritization [7:71428]

In DLCI Prioritization , what's a primary DLCI , is it the dlci specified in the frame-relay interface dlci command ( is it XX ) ?? Can you create priority-dlci-group in a physical interface ( major interface like serial 0 for eg., I understand it can be done in a sub-interface )..?? /Srivat

Subinterfaces [7:71421]

Hi, Any ideas on why encapsulation is not allowed on individual FR subinterfaces but rather on the physical interface only..?? TIA Srivathsan Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71421&t=71421 -- FAQ, list archives,

Windowing [7:71333]

Hi, This might have something to do with the protocol design . I was wondering whether all the connection-oriented / reliable protocols use " Windowing " . Can the group add elaborate on this please..? TIA Srivathsan A Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=71333&t=

FR Backup Over ISDN [7:71332]

Hi Group, This is pertaining to FR Backup over ISDN http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/125/12.html#topic21 "It may not help much to back up the main interface because you could lose permanent virtual circuits (PVCs) without the main interface going down. Remember, the protocol is being exchanged

RE: EIGRP & Distance command [7:71220]

Not sure though , but a "clear ip route" after changing the "distance" might work. Awaiting valuable inputs from the other grp members . Regards, Srivathsan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 10:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Traffic share count [7:71116]

OSPF doesn't allow you to do a unequal cost load balancing . With EIGRP , this can be achieved by using the "variance" command ( under "router eigrp" ). The " traffic share count " value is an indicaion of how many packets would be transmitted over the various paths ( equal cost ( in which case i

RE: Multiple Default Routes [7:70914]

You might wanna check this link . http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk80/technologies_tech_note09186a0 0800ef7b2.shtml Thanks, Srivathsan A -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Poulin, Darnell Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 1:48 PM To: [EM

RE: Password Recovery 3600 [7:69762]

Hi, Looks like a baud rate mismatch. Can you please check what's the baud settings both at the Rom Monitor and the console login . Cheers vathsan -Original Message- From: Funnell Giles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passwor