Re: cisco works

2001-03-14 Thread nobody
cw2k on nt i ran it on a p3, 500mb ram, 12gig ide, and it was slugish. from talking to others and implementing it at different sites my experience is to not to get anything less than: dual processor p4 or p3 with 1 gig ram 2 4+gig ultra-wide scsi-2 hdds cw2k on solaris this is a better solut

Re: CCNP Certification

2001-03-05 Thread nobody
692 is support 2.0 foundation is 700+ on each of the parts. (the cert from the test does not say) - Original Message - From: "Johnny Sun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2000 11:18 PM Subject: re: CCNP Certification > CCNP Foundation 165 minutres

Re: Private Vlans

2001-02-27 Thread nobody
sholm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "nobody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Roberts, Timothy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:11 PM Subject: RE: Private Vlans > Thank you, "nobody" for helping teach common sense

Re: Private Vlans

2001-02-27 Thread nobody
i thought this is an appropriate link for all, who first want to learn how to search the web and then do it right. http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/hqlibrary/pathfinders/nethelp.htm and here is the info you should have found at www.cisco.com on VLANs: http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/PSP/psp_v

Re: Cert Difficulty Comparison.

2001-02-27 Thread nobody
easy is a relative term. if you want to increase the difficulty, you can do what i did and take foundation 2.0 and support 2.0 on the same day. should be enough to keep you busy for 3 weeks. i missed my foundation by 20 points. no excuses. p. - Original Message - From: "Craig Lindstrom"

Re: what is the average age of people in this stuff?

2001-02-27 Thread nobody
there is one thing to say to all those that cry i am too old, i am too young, i am .. my experience is: if you are good, everybody else will tell you. else if you are doing your own advertising, you are not there yet ;-) p. ...been young, ...been old and still doing my own advertising ;-)

Re: ??Fw: need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables

2001-02-26 Thread nobody
Priscilla, > > > just need to verify my thinking: > > > > > > example: serial line (PPP) connection between routers A and B using ip > > > unnumbered. > > > > > > router A: > > > e0=192.168.1.1/24 > > > s0=192.168.3.1/24 > > > Why does s0 have an address if it's unnumbered? Good catch. I did not

??Fw: need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables

2001-02-26 Thread nobody
Is the below a dumb question? Nobody replied. Can somebody enlighten me? ;-) p. - Original Message - From: "nobody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 23, 2001 2:07 PM Subject: need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables

need clarification: ip unnumbered in routing tables

2001-02-23 Thread nobody
just need to verify my thinking: example: serial line (PPP) connection between routers A and B using ip unnumbered. router A: e0=192.168.1.1/24 s0=192.168.3.1/24 routing table for A: c192.168.1.0/24is directly connected, ethernet0 r192.168.2.0/24[120/1] via 192.168.3.2, 00:00:05

Re: CiscoWorks 2000

2001-01-15 Thread nobody
can you be more specific on what's slow? and what are the specs of the server? just because the proces monitor says that nothing is going on, doesn't mean nothing is going on -> it's microsoft ;-) peter PIA#0001 - Original Message - From: "Rik Guyler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Cisco Group

Re: Subnet mask question..

2000-10-14 Thread Nobody
Default netmask for class B is 255.255.0.0 with 11 subnet mask you will have /27 ie 255.255.255.224 it's bit confusing though.. Nobody Keith Woodworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > Ive been at this for quite a while and the odd subnet q

Re: Silicon Valley Cisco User Group

2000-06-27 Thread nobody
http://www.bacug.com/ - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 11:45 AM Subject: Silicon Valley Cisco User Group > > > Does anyone have any info on this group - meeting times, dates, locations or > website > > Thanks in adv