Re: redistribute bgp to rip (please help!!!) [7:70970]

fiddling around, redistribute internal works for me and there is no more problem. Thanks for your help Paul Zsombor Papp wrote: > At 11:32 AM 6/20/2003 +0000, paul dong so wrote: > >>More information to this. >> >>r4 - eigrp - r10 - bgp- >> >>now i have tried

Re: redistribute bgp to rip (please help!!!) [7:70970]

FD is 2169856 via Connected, Serial0 P 200.200.200.4/30, 1 successors, FD is 2681856 via 200.200.200.10 (2681856/2169856), Serial0 r4# Paul paul dong so wrote: > Hi, > Can some one pls explain to me, when redistribute bgp to rip, if the > route originated as inc

redistribute bgp to rip [7:70928]

Hi, Can some one pls explain to me, when redistribute bgp to rip, if the route originated as incomplete (as via redistribute only) will it be redistribute to rip? My test shows me the bgp route learned via redistribute won't be advertised to rip, only when i include it in networks statement. Th

PPP mru option [7:66007]

Hi All, I have a question but can't find an answer from RFC 1661 During ppp negotiation, if A advertises MRU 1440, B advertises MRU 1460, do they have to re-negotiate to agree with a MRU? If so, should it be the lower MRU? If they don't need to re-negotiate, what MRU is actually being used? Is

Re: redistribution loop? [7:65962]

efore not be > overwritten by redistribution, Same on R7. > > I guess I am just not seeing what the topology is or where you think the > break should be. > > > ""paul dong so"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Hi All, >> &

redistribution loop? [7:65962]

Hi All, Practicing redistribution. (route) - r8 - (eigrp) - r7 - ospf- r6 | | --- eigrp 150.50.3.0/24 is redistributed by r8 eigrp, r8 advertises it to r7 via eigrp. R7 redistributes eigrp to ospf, also redistribute ospf to eigrp.

ospf md5 authentication [7:63580]

Hi all, Here is the another question i came across in the lab When plain text passwd (type 1) is used as ospf authentication, it checks the actual passwd. when md5 (type 2) is used, a wrong passwd was set on purpose, surprisingly the adjacency was still able to be established. Read Doyle book, it

ospf p2p network type vs frame relay inarp [7:63579]

Hi all, I did some tests and found this problem. Ra is the hub of fr connection, rc is the spoke When only inarp used, all ospf network types passed the test except p2p network type. No adjacency was able to be established. OSPF states kept looping between init, exstart and exchange. Note, same co

Re: ICMP restriction [7:63225]

Hamed, You can try this command "no ip unreachable" under your serial interface Paul Hamed Sedighi wrote: > Dear Sirs/Madams, > > I restricted ICMP protocol on my input serial port as following: > > access-list 102 deny icmp any 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 echo > > At now, when a person do PING

Re: frame relay lmi-n39x functions [7:63120]

rrors > from 3 to 2. This is only relevant when no status answers are > received. > Try the following link: > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_command_reference_chapter09186a00800ca7eb.html > > Jens Neelsen > > --- paul dong

frame relay lmi-n39x functions [7:63120]

Hi all, while practicing frame-relay lmi-n39x commonds, i can not make the commonds work as they are supposed to be. Scenario: frame-relay switch RA on RA, use lmi autosense. basic FR function works fine, following config is abstract only serial 0 encapsulation frame-relay frame-relay i

Passed CCIE written exam [7:62854]

Hi all, Just passed the written and feel like i need to say something. Really want to say thanks for all the helps I gained from this study group. Test is 3 hours, 150 questions, single or multiple choices. If mulitple, will give indication how many answers. Can go backward and forward to check t

Re: passed ccie written [7:62484]

Hi, I think my PC has problem, my emails don't seem to be shown, but they are actully there. If I have sent a few of them, please forgive me. :) I was asked a few questions, here are the answers: 1. token ring and ipx are the topics you need to know as they are listed in the blueprint 2. ther

Re: passed ccie written [7:62395]

PX. Did you have the same feeling? > > Thanks, > Leon > > paul dong so wrote: > > >>Hi all, >> >>Just passed the written and feel like i need to say something. Really >>want to say thanks for all the helps I gained from this study group. >> &g

passed ccie written [7:62395]

Hi all, Just passed the written and feel like i need to say something. Really want to say thanks for all the helps I gained from this study group. Test is 3 hours, 150 questions, single or multiple choices. If mulitple, will give indication how many answers. Can go backward and forward to check t

preparation tips for ccie lab [7:62434]

Hi all, Passed the written and am prepraring to crack the hardest part. I appreciate any tips and recommendation on where to start(equipment is not my concern at this point) and what is the best study strategy in terms of time allocation, focusing areas, good study materials, etc. Thanks in advan

TACACS password encryption [7:60886]

Hi all, Am reading cramsession notes and there are statement like this: 1. The entire body of Tacacs+ packet is encrypted is ther is a shared key on the router and server. 2. Tacacs transmits passwords in clear text Dont' they conflict? Is the user password encrypted or not? Thanks Paul Me

fragmentation question [7:60643]

Hi All, Please shed a light on this as I am confused. Fragmentation for UDP/TCP: * Only the first fragment contains the UDP or TCP header, not the sequencial fragments? Fragementation for IP packets * every fragmented packet will contains ip header? MTU 1500 bytes, doesn't it mean the data pa