Exam 350-001, I'm so pissed!

2000-08-26 Thread shanseverijn
I just want to say for the record that this exam is a bunch of B.S. All you tell you why. I took this test like a cuople weeks after I finished my CCNP/CCDP just to see where I stand and what I need to hit for this thing. Let me say that the CCIE exam 350-001 is highly overraded. So I scored

Re: Finally CCNP

2000-08-26 Thread shanseverijn
Geezz, way over kill! With all this training and equipment you should be a CCIE by now... -- Shannon Severijn CCNP, CCDP, MCSE Snot-Nosed Gen. X Punk Kid... (Cisco Mercenary) [EMAIL PROTECTED] "John Hardman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:8ntqg7$msi$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All... >

Re: CIT Support Exam in CCNP 2.0 Track.

2000-08-26 Thread shanseverijn
The only thing that has changes is the name. Super-easy test. -- Shannon Severijn CCNP, CCDP, MCSE Snot-Nosed Gen. X Punk Kid... (Cisco Mercenary) [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Eazhil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hi All, > I would like to clarify,whet

Re: BCRAN

2000-08-18 Thread shanseverijn
Don't worry about typing in alot of cmds. The test only has 6-8 questions where they have you type in actual cmds. There easy. eg. copy run start, sh tech, sh cpu proc, sh interface. Know your ISDN, AAA, Virtual templates / profiles, DDR, x.25, frame-relay. For some reason they hit you on al

Re: switching 2.0 --help

2000-08-18 Thread shanseverijn
When I took the test all I got hit on was -trunking -VTP -STP (sh spantree, portfast, uplinkfast) -Mulitcast. (CGMP, IGMP, DVMRP) -Of course VLANS -RSM (cmd syntax, etc.) -it's weird alot ofthe questions on the 2.0 tests are pretty vague only a couple ask for you to specify cmd's now. THe 2.0