thanks
-Original Message-
From: Stull, Cory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 11:05 PM
To: Yee, Jason; 'Flem'; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
Subject: RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?
I'm not sure what setting the frame-relay keepaliv
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 1:57 AM
To: 'Flem'; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
Subject: RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?
can't catch what you are trying to say
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Flem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 2:4
thank you very much your explanation is crystal clear
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 1:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?
10 seconds is the
ECTED]> on 10/10/2000 11:49:45 am
Please respond to "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Jay Hennigan'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:(bcc: JENNY MCLEOD/NSO/CSDA)
Subject:
it's a receive-only dish
the customer has a terrestrial link for the return path
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Jay Hennigan
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keepalive set in
On 9 Oct 2000 22:50:50 -0400, Yee, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:this interface is connected to a comstream modem (satellite modem) then out
:as a satellite link to frame-relay switch
Check with Comstream. Do they specify frame-relay encapsulation?
When you say "modem", is it a regular RS-
]
Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?
On 9 Oct 2000 20:58:12 -0400, Yee, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:if that is the case setting keepalives to what value is optimal?
:
:10 , I tried setting it to 10 but it went down
To what, if anything, is this interface physically con
On 9 Oct 2000 20:58:12 -0400, Yee, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:if that is the case setting keepalives to what value is optimal?
:
:10 , I tried setting it to 10 but it went down
To what, if anything, is this interface physically connected?
--
Jay Hennigan - Network Administration -
: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?
On 9 Oct 2000 01:54:14 -0400, Yee, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:hi anyone
:
:knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit
:straight away went up ie line protocol is up
The keepalive setting on a frame-relay int
On 9 Oct 2000 01:54:14 -0400, Yee, Jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:hi anyone
:
:knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit
:straight away went up ie line protocol is up
The keepalive setting on a frame-relay interface determines the LMI interval.
Turning it off s
Yee ,
inline .
--- "Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi anyone
>
> knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero
> my frame-relay circuit
> straight away went up ie line protocol is up
>
> I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the
> LMI is taking care of it
> right?
Kee
Yeahh,,
Thats 100 % Right
Faisal.
"Yee, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi anyone
knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit
straight away went up ie line protocol is up
I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the LMI is taking care of it
right?
C
can't catch what you are trying to say
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Flem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2000 2:48 PM
To: Yee, Jason; cisco@groupstudy. com (E-mail)
Subject: Re: keepalive set in frame-relay circuit?
Yee ,
inline .
--- "Yee, Jaso
hi anyone
knows why after having set my keepalive to be zero my frame-relay circuit
straight away went up ie line protocol is up
I believe there is no need to set keepalive as the LMI is taking care of it
right?
Correct me if I am wrong
thanks
Jason
**NOTE: New CCNA/CCDA List has been forme
14 matches
Mail list logo
