. Kevin Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]
We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is
prohibitively
expensive in our rural area.
Has anyone done any speed comparisons on using
.
Thank your for the different perspective.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Bob Timmons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 5:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]
Why not use BGP? If both lines are to the same provider
We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is prohibitively
expensive in our rural area.
Has anyone done any speed comparisons on using round robin style static
routes
(i.e. 2 default routes w/ same cost) versus EIGRP's load balanceing versus
running MLPPP on the Serial
Just had something come up with a customer along these lines.
Your provider may or may not do MPPP with customers. I believe SBCIS, for
example, will not do it no way no how. So first thing, check with your
provider as to what they are willing to do.
Per packet load share on the 26xx platform
-
From: W. Kevin Hunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 2 T1's to our provider [7:49039]
We are upgrading to 2 T1's to our provider, Fractional DS3 is prohibitively
expensive in our rural area.
Has anyone done any speed comparisons
5 matches
Mail list logo
