Re: 2 interesting questions on DLSW + [7:43041]

2002-05-05 Thread Chris Camplejohn
Check out: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fibm _r1/br1fprt2/br1fdlsw.htm#xtocid6 " Each remote peer has a single list number associated with it; therefore, if you want traffic to go to a bridge group and to either a ring list or port list, you should speci

Re: 2 interesting questions on DLSW + [7:43041]

2002-05-02 Thread Rahul Mehta
according to my understanding , it applies ring-list. Rahul Mehta ""William Lijewski"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have two questions about DLSW + that I could use some explainations for. > I would greatly appreciate any feedback you may have. > > 1) When y

2 interesting questions on DLSW + [7:43041]

2002-05-01 Thread William Lijewski
I have two questions about DLSW + that I could use some explainations for. I would greatly appreciate any feedback you may have. 1) When you are doing DLSW Lite across the Frame Relay why is it necessary to map the LLC2 across the frame when you are not using passthrough? I can undertand it whe

2 interesting questions on DLSW + [7:43041]

2002-05-01 Thread William Lijewski
I have two questions about DLSW + that I could use some explainations for. I would greatly appreciate any feedback you may have. 1) When you are doing DLSW Lite across the Frame Relay why is it necessary to map the LLC2 across the frame when you are not using passthrough? I can undertand it whe