nk to the min active IMA
links.
> > This will indeed allow you to utilize one link per IMA group. But that
is
> > not the problem.
> > If the carrier doesn't support IMA (i.e. terminating the circuit to a T1
> > card and not a cell relay card with IMA support),
ort), all you will see is:
> status is up while the line protocol is down.
> That's why you will need to use pass through mode.
>
> Thanks
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "MADMAN"
> To: "GS"
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 1
h IMA support), all you will see is:
status is up while the line protocol is down.
That's why you will need to use pass through mode.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "MADMAN"
To: "GS"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: ATM with
Actually I have done serveral IMA configs utilizing regular ole T1
circuits and you only need a single subnet if you configure an IMA
interface and assign the interfaces to it via the ima group.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/121/paima.html
Dave
GS wrote:
>
> You should ask you carrier wha
You should ask you carrier what type of cards they are terminating the T1
lines to. Most carriers support IMA and all u need is properly configure
your IMA group. If however you carrier have delivered three T1 in the form
of three separate local loops and they are terminating your access to T1
car
Hi group,
I have a few 7200 with ATM-CES adapters in them. I
want to depoly them over WAN with a 4.5 meg bandwidth
to each. The telco handed to us 3 T1s. I would
assume an IMA device of some kind is needed here.
However, I still want to use the existing ATM-CES
adapters for this case. How wo
6 matches
Mail list logo
