Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-04 Thread Hunt Lee
Hello there, I need some help on Access-Lists: Say if I want to permit network access to only 10.10.10.1 - 10.10.10.254 I know you can simply use: Access-list 10 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 However, if I want to only permit the range of 10.10.10.40 to 10.10.10.49 (inclusive), then what should

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-04 Thread Godswill HO
with one single statement. When appliying it to your interface say: Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in Regards. Oletu - Original Message - From: Hunt Lee To: Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001] > Hello there, > > I need

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Shengtao
range > without affecting other addresses with one single statement. > > When appliying it to your interface say: > > Router(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in > > Regards. > Oletu > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Hunt Lee > To: > Sent: Friday, January 04,

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Gaz
ter(config-if)#IP access-group allowed in > > > > Regards. > > Oletu > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Hunt Lee > > To: > > Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 9:29 PM > > Subject: Access-List questions [7:31001] > > > > >

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Hunt Lee
s n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while > the > > > last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole > range > > > without affecting other addresses with one single statement. > > > > > > When appliying it to your interface say: > > > > >

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
gt; > > > last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole > > range > > > > without affecting other addresses with one single statement. > > > > > > > > When appliying it to your interface say: > > > > > > >

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Brian Whalen
atement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while > > the > > > > last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole > > range > > > > without affecting other addresses with one single statement. > > > > > > > &

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread D. J. Jones
gt; > > > > > > The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while > > the > > > > last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole > > range > > > > without affecting other addresses with one single statement. >

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Hunt Lee
> > > > Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 > > > > > Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 > > > > > > > > > > The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, > while > > > the > > > > > last one allow address n.n.n.

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-05 Thread Gaz
CTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Try the following: > > > > > > > > > > IP access-list standard allowed > > > > > Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-06 Thread Tom Lisa
0.0.0.0 > > > > > > > > The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to n.n.n.48, while > > the > > > > last one allow address n.n.n.49. There is no way you can deny whole > > range > > > > without affecting other addresses with one single stat

Re: Access-List questions [7:31001]

2002-01-07 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
allowed > > > > > Permit 10.10.10.40 0.0.0.7 > > > > > Permit 10.10.10.49 0.0.0.0 > > > > > > > > > > The first permit statement allow addresses n.n.n.40 to > n.n.n.48, > while > > > the > > > > >