Re: BGP AS removal [7:66928]

2003-04-06 Thread Peter van Oene
At 01:53 AM 4/6/2003 +, Bullwinkle wrote: In other words, for purposes of testing, there are ONLY two ways to remove things from the AS_PATH. 1) the technique you describe, which is to create Both these techniques are invalid in my opinion. If you create a new route, you haven't changed the

Re: BGP AS removal [7:66928]

2003-04-05 Thread Salvatore De Luca
I have to agree that it is a bit silly, dangerous, and should not be done on a production enviornment.. but so are a lot of scenarios on the CCIE Lab.. Just to add to the sillyness: Not sure how this would work, but you can try it.. have you tried as-path manupulation? From what I can see you

Re: BGP AS removal [7:66928]

2003-04-05 Thread Peter van Oene
At 04:22 PM 4/2/2003 -0500, you wrote: 150.50.200.0(R1)(R2)--(R3). R1 belongs to AS1 R2 belongs to AS2 R3 belongs to AS3 I inject 150.50.200.0 using the network command on R1 and see 150.50.200.0 in R3 with as_path of 2 1. The question is how can I remove the 1 from the As Path on R3.

Re: BGP AS removal [7:66928]

2003-04-05 Thread Peter van Oene
At 08:26 PM 4/5/2003 +, Salvatore De Luca wrote: I have to agree that it is a bit silly, dangerous, and should not be done on a production enviornment.. but so are a lot of scenarios on the CCIE Lab.. Just to add to the sillyness: Because it is silly and dangerous, you also can't do it

Re: BGP AS removal [7:66928]

2003-04-05 Thread Salvatore De Luca
I hear ya.. that's why if this was a TEST situation, the statement: ip as-path access-list 1 permit _2_ ! _2_ _1$ would permit routes traversing AS2 but deny any routes traversed though AS2 Originating in AS1. In which case 150.50.200.0 aggregated element should be the nlri Fresh Route point for

Re: BGP AS removal [7:66928]

2003-04-05 Thread Bullwinkle
In other words, for purposes of testing, there are ONLY two ways to remove things from the AS_PATH. 1) the technique you describe, which is to create an aggregate and advertise that aggregate only ( although refresh my memory - an aggregate might still contain full AS_PATH information - don't have

Re: BGP AS removal [7:66928]

2003-04-05 Thread Salvatore De Luca
Agreed by me.. the trick is it seems that we want to remove AS1 from the AS-path without filtering the whole IP Block. As long as AS2 Can Create the route you want advertised to R3,(Network Statments pointing to Null route injections will do this and put it in the BGP table). You can then filter