Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-28 Thread Stephane LITKOWSKI
Ok, for me it was implicit to configure outbound filtering to upstream in order to not become Transit AS. Jason Greenberg a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No, the filter lists would only be to prevent the default route from being advertised back out the other upstream link.

Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-27 Thread Jay Greenberg
built into itself. Am I missing something? Jason - Original Message - From: Jay Greenberg Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:52 PM Subject: Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807] If you don't want the run the IGP on the firewall, then just run something between

Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-27 Thread Scott
Check out BGP conditional advertisement. HTH, Scott sam sneed wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have a pair of 2621's and 2 reduandant ethernet handoffs to my ISP. 1 is a primary and the other is a backup which should only be used if the primary fails. On my

Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-27 Thread Jason Greenberg
How does bgp conditional apply here? On Sat, 2002-07-27 at 10:52, Scott wrote: Check out BGP conditional advertisement. HTH, Scott sam sneed wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have a pair of 2621's and 2 reduandant ethernet handoffs to my ISP. 1 is a

Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-27 Thread Stephane LITKOWSKI
A couple of suggestions: 1) If you run iBGP, be *sure* not to advertize the default route learned from one edge router, through iBGP to the other edge router, and back out the other upstream. You can use a filter list to prevent that. I agree with you about your technique but : Why do you

Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-27 Thread Jason Greenberg
No, the filter lists would only be to prevent the default route from being advertised back out the other upstream link. Note that usually the BGP AS-path loop avoidance rules will prevent a problem in this scenario (especially with only the default route being advertised), but in a more advanced

Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-26 Thread Jay Greenberg
If you don't want the run the IGP on the firewall, then just run something between the 2 gateway routers. iBGP would do the trick, and you are running BGP anyway. You could still use HSRP for your own extra router redundancy, but not for upstream selection. On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 16:28, sam

Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-26 Thread sam sneed
did more research, would a next-hop-self on RA and RB respectively do the trick? sam sneed wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I have a pair of 2621's and 2 reduandant ethernet handoffs to my ISP. 1 is a primary and the other is a backup which should only be used

Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-26 Thread Jay Greenberg
If I understand you correctly, I don't think that HRSP is what you need. HRSP is good if upstream serial interfaces go down, or something like that, or for router redundancy, but in your situation I would suggest letting your IGP determine which upstream is active, based on who is still

Re: BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-26 Thread sam sneed
I have a very small network, only 3 networks so i really don;t want to run an IGP. I especially don't want to run it on my firewall. The ISP suggested the HSRP solution since we are using static route between our firewall and these 2 routers. I know there has to be way to do this and am trying to

BGP and HSRP [7:49807]

2002-07-26 Thread sam sneed
I have a pair of 2621's and 2 reduandant ethernet handoffs to my ISP. 1 is a primary and the other is a backup which should only be used if the primary fails. On my side i am running HSRP for fault tolerance RA is configured asprimary in my HSRP group. I will be doing BGP peering with my