Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

Hello All : Lately, I am hearing a lot of waves about Juniper routers such as m20, m40,... etc. as the core router being used by ISP's, rather than  Cisco 7000 series or 12000 series routers. Does anyone have info on this matter... Is Cisco being challenged by JUNIPER at the core end... Any info

RE: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

manufacturers, but are loyal to who is writing the code.   Regards,   David Wolsefer    -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanjay DalalSent: Monday, September 25, 2000 12:13 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

Re: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

Yes, take a read of Why Cisco's 'monopoly' is on the line !!   at:   http://www.vnunet.com/Analysis/1107036   Also I have seen job ads requesting Juniper rather as well as Cisco skills !         Sanjay Dalal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in me   ssage [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

Now that's a problem, because unless you are lucky and your shop gets Junipers, there's not that much you can do to show you're interested enough (i.e. no certifications). OTOH, it definitely solves the problem of hands-on vs. paper-certs. ;) There's a whole lot of documentation at Juniper's site,

RE: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

There is an article in Businessweek 9/11/00 that talks about Juniper "The Upstart That's Eating Cisco's Lunch".  The gist is:  Juniper's market share has risen from 17% to 22% as of the end of June.  At the same time, Cisco's market share in the core router market has dropped from 80% to 75%

Re: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

Juniper has something called "the olive" which is a PC running JunOS. So you can have a "Juniper" with 2 fastether interface to play with. You get all the features, just not the speed. I don't know if they can make it available to just anybody... Call you local Juniper rep. Patrick > Now that's

Re: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

Funny, I was thinking the exact same thing, I guess it's only logical, being as it is that the JunOS runs in a PC... Thanks for the tip! Francisco Muniz _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.

Re: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

A little trivia for you - the "M" stands for Martini I've had a little exposure to Junipers - a course and some configuration. The OS (JUNOS) has a lot of similarities to IOS which is not suprising as the company was started by former Cisco employees. As others have pointed out they are selling

RE: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

ssage-From: Iohan Reyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, September 25, 2000 4:32 PMTo: Sanjay DalalCc: 'Cisco@Groupstudy. Com'Subject: RE: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer There is an article in Businessweek 9/11/00 that talks about Juniper "The Upstart T

Re: Cisco versus Juniper at the corelayer

manufacturers, but are loyal to who is writing the code.   Regards,   David Wolsefer    -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sanjay DalalSent: Monday, September 25, 2000 12:13 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Cisco