CiscoWorks on Solaris or Win2K ? [7:62226]

2003-01-30 Thread HulaJoe
One more thing - Is anyone running the latest version of the LMS suite on an Ultra-II ? I have a choice between an Ultra-II with dual 166Mhz, 512Mb RAM, or a Dell 2400 with Dual P-III 500Mhz and 512 MB RAM. I figured that the native port on Solaris would perform better. Any suggestions ? Thanks

Re: CiscoWorks on Solaris or Win2K ? [7:62226]

2003-01-31 Thread Juntao
I wouldn't even think about it, Solaris.RULES. ""HulaJoe"" a icrit dans le message de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > One more thing - Is anyone running the latest version of the LMS suite on an > Ultra-II ? > > I have a choice between an Ultra-II with dual 166Mhz, 512Mb RAM, or a Dell > 2400 with

RE: CiscoWorks on Solaris or Win2K ? [7:62226]

2003-01-31 Thread Pistone, Mike
: HulaJoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 7:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: CiscoWorks on Solaris or Win2K ? [7:62226] One more thing - Is anyone running the latest version of the LMS suite on an Ultra-II ? I have a choice between an Ultra-II with dual 166Mhz

Re: CiscoWorks on Solaris or Win2K ? [7:62226]

2003-01-31 Thread John Neiberger
Run, run, run away from any network management tools that run on Windows. :-) I had nothing but problems running CW2K on a windows box. Since I migrated to Solaris I haven't really had any problems. Well, no problems related to the operating system, that is. If Cisco were to decide to dump the