Another DLSW Question [7:56042]

Hi, I have another task for you guys. I would appreciate your help. I have R2 and ring 100 attached to it. On ring 100 there is a PC with mac address , I do not want r3 and r4 send 'explorer' to find this machine. For this to work, I think I can use "dlsw icanreach mac-address " on

DLSW Question [7:52644]

How can we prevent the dlsw connection falling back from backup peer to primary peer when the later comes back alive. The 'linger' option with '0' sec and the 'no linger' option does not seems to be solving the issue. Any helpers please... Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.

RE: Fw: RIF over DLSW question? [7:17894]

I could write a couple pages on this, but try and give you a quick run down. I would suggest that you do some more reading on the subject though. EXAMPLE TOPOLOGY: Host1--Ring8---Bridge1---Serial Link-Bridge2Ring9Host2 RSRB is passthrough for the RIF, in order for it to work, you h

Fw: RIF over DLSW question? [7:17894]

Hello,, If i have 2 router connected via serial connection with DLSW and try to connect to other side SRB (token ring network). What will happen to the RIF that was generated from the source to destination? And, How is it diffenent in RSRB instead of DLSW? Thanks in advance Jin Jung Messag

RIF over DLSW question? [7:17757]

Hello,, If i have 2 router connected serial connection with DLSW and try to connect to other side via SRB (token ring network). What will happen to the RIF that was generated from the source to destination? And, How is it diffenent in RSRB instead of DLSW? Thanks in advance Jin Jung Messag

Re: DLSW+ question

I was thinking about CRB and writing about IRB, what a knucklehead! Good point about DLSW not performing local translation Flem. >From: Flem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: DLSW+ question >Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:54:07 -0800

Re: DLSW+ question

At first glance, I see that your loopback interfaces are in the same subnet. If you were on RouterA and tried to ping 10.1.1.2, it should fail because it thinks it is local. Try placing them on different subnets and see if that works. Hmmm...I just noticed the redistribute connected in your eigr

Re: DLSW+ question

ot; state. Fix your routing so that you can do an extended ping between the Dlsw peers .Fix this and Dlsw and Dlsw will work . Take a look at your routing tables flem > > - Original Message - > From: Richard Gallagher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROT

Re: DLSW+ question

uesday, January 30, 2001 11:55 AM Subject: Re: DLSW+ question > You are currently on the ethernet interface, try adding the following command > on both routers: > > bridge irb > brigde 1 route ip > > Rich > > On Jan 30, 6:48pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] chatted about: > >

Re: DLSW+ question

You are currently on the ethernet interface, try adding the following command on both routers: bridge irb brigde 1 route ip Rich On Jan 30, 6:48pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] chatted about: > Subject:DLSW+ question > > I am trying to setup two routers with DLSW+ , when I do with routing ,I can'= > t=20

DLSW+ question

I am trying to setup two routers with DLSW+ , when I do with routing ,I can'= t=20 ping each other loopback interfaces for some reason.=20 Hostname DCE_Router dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.1.1.1 dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.1.1.2 dlsw bridge-group 1 Loopback0 =A0 ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0 i