Take a look at Halabi (First Edition) p. 300, and riddle me this regarding
Figure 10-1:
How does network 192.68.12.0 get into RTF's routing table? The EBGP session
needs to be established before RTF can accept any routes from RTD. But how
can the session be established before RTF knows how to r
I think one has to assume that there is reachability via some means between the two
routers. Sam indicates at the beginning of the section that only relevant snippets of
configs will be posted in each example and in this case I expect there are missing
items both on F and the intermediary E.
gt;; Chris Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Neil Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jim Coyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Victor Alba
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jeff Assarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Phil Heller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 10
day, February 25, 2001 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: EBGP multihop question
There would not be an IGP running between F and D or F and E. F only has a
neighbor statement to D to allow it to establish a peering relationship with
it. The neighbor 192.168.12.1 ebgp-multihop statement in F's BGP routing
neighbor and bring up the bgp tcp session.
Halabi probably ommited that for breivity..
Brian
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Groupstudy
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 2:55 PM
> Subject: Re: EBGP multihop question
>
>
> Th
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: EBGP multihop question
> I agree with everything you say. But it doesn't answer my question. ;-)
> Think in terms of basic routing: how does RTF ping RTD? There's no entry
in
> its routing table for 192.68.12.0. As you say, the
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jim Coyne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Victor Alba
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Jeff Assarian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Phil Heller
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 10:40 AM
>Subject: EBGP multihop question
>
>
>> Take a look a
7 matches
Mail list logo
