RE: Ethernet switching

2001-02-01 Thread Bob Vance
]On Behalf Of Priscilla Oppenheimer Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 8:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ethernet switching At 04:32 PM 1/31/01, Fred Danson wrote: Ok, now from my understanding, each port on a switch is its own collision domain. As far as broadcast domains go, if

Ethernet switching

2001-01-31 Thread alexs
Hello everyone, I have a question that probably will sound silly but here it is: Suppose that you take a new 2924 out of the box and you plug in two PC's. You assign address, for example, 142.102.2.1 to the first one and 142.102.3.1 to the second one.There is not any router in this small

RE: Ethernet switching

2001-01-31 Thread Fowler, Joey
- From: alexs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2000 7:42 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ethernet switching Hello everyone, I have a question that probably will sound silly but here it is: Suppose that you take a new 2924 out of the box and you plug in two PC's. You

RE: Ethernet switching

2001-01-31 Thread Sheahan, Ryan
- From: Fowler, Joey To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 1/31/01 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Ethernet switching Depends on the subnet mask you are using, for instance 142.102.3.1 with a subnet mask of 255.255.0.0 142.102.2.1 also with a subnet of 255.255.0.0 The 2.1 and 3.1 would be on the same subnet, however

FW: Ethernet switching

2001-01-31 Thread Rik Guyler
: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 11:24 AM To: 'Fowler, Joey '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Subject: RE: Ethernet switching These are my thoughts, If the switch was right out of the box, the stations could ping each other no matter what subnet mask you were using. The reason being, they are located in the same

Re: Ethernet switching

2001-01-31 Thread John Neiberger
and still get a ping response Kane - Original Message - From: "Sheahan, Ryan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Fowler, Joey '" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:23 AM Subject: RE: Ethernet switching These are my thoughts,

Re: Ethernet switching

2001-01-31 Thread Kane
Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:08 AM Subject: Re: Ethernet switching In this scenario , it would also not matter what ip address you assigned to the stations . ie: you could set one at 10.x.x.x /8 and the other at 192.x.x.x/28 and still get a ping response Kane - Original Message -

Re: Ethernet switching

2001-01-31 Thread Fred Danson
TECTED],"'Fowler, Joey '" [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Ethernet switching Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:08:09 +1300 - Original Message - From: "Sheahan, Ryan" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Fowler, Joey '" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROT

RE: Ethernet switching

2001-01-31 Thread Bob Vance
, Ryan Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 11:24 AM To: 'Fowler, Joey '; '[EMAIL PROTECTED] ' Subject: RE: Ethernet switching These are my thoughts, If the switch was right out of the box, the stations could ping each other no matter what subnet mask you were using. The reason being, they are located

RE: Ethernet switching

2001-01-31 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
t: 1/31/01 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Ethernet switching Depends on the subnet mask you are using, for instance 142.102.3.1 with a subnet mask of 255.255.0.0 142.102.2.1 also with a subnet of 255.255.0.0 The 2.1 and 3.1 would be on the same subnet, however if you have a different subnet mask I d