FW: PIX Question !!! [7:40465]

dont you have to place the inside ip addrres on the outside interface? i think you have it reverse, ip address inside 192.168.2.14 255.255.255.248 ip address outside 216.6.24.129 255.255.255.192 then nat (inside) 0 192.168.2.14 255.255.255.0 0 0 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

FW: pix question [7:36500]

thanks for the info -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Roberts, Larry Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 8:33 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: pix question [7:36500] Oops, typo alert. The Global statement should read: Global (outside)

Fw: PIX Question [7:2061]

haha...got filtered for s exu al content ;) Not sure where... - Original Message - From: "Allen May" To: Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:16 AM Subject: Re: PIX Question [7:2061] > 525 has a 600MHz processor and yes...520 is going away soon. > http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/cc/p

Fw: PIX question

Crap..typo below. Box sitting outside the pix needs to log to the syslog server inside the pix. - Original Message - From: "Allen May" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:17 AM Subject: Fw: PIX question > OK a little

Fw: PIX question

OK a little more info. We have a PIX-PIX VPN set up so encryption only pertains to connections between the two office locations over a dedicated connection. In our location, there is a network outside the PIX before it goes to the Router to the other location. The box sitting on the outside the