Everyone,
I have a site that is currently connected with a 512k frame relay link. We
are adding an additional T1 link to the same location. Is it possible to
aggregate these links in such a way that traffic will be carried across
both? If they are configured this way, will the other link still be
One thing you can look at is EIGRP and unequal cost load balancing.
Here is a link that explains what it is:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a008009437d.shtml
Waters, Kristina wrote:
Everyone,
I have a site that is currently connected with a 512k
Make it easy.
Call your Frame Relay Provider
Poss alternatives?
Multi-link Frame Relay Allows for multiple T-1 pipes to be bonded.
Look at multi link PPP or otherwise setting new sub interface and dlci from
provider.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=62092t=62087
Jason, this sounds like exactly what I'm looking for. Thanks!
Kris.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Owens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help the newbie... [7:62087]
One thing you can look at is EIGRP
on the vendor.
-Original Message-
From: Waters, Kristina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help the newbie... [7:62087]
Everyone,
I have a site that is currently connected with a 512k frame relay link. We
are adding an additional T1
actually FRF.16.1, will not suport ISDN interfaces or any virtual interface
for that matter, also because of the latency introduced when having
different bundle links of differing speeds, it's recommended to use links of
the same speed.
of course the router must be a 2600 and up, with 12.2.(8)T if
another option is to use ospf and cef to load balance the links then
configure BGP with loopback interfaces to use the two ospf routes (make them
equal cost). same concept as using two static routes but a little more
flexibility.
Xueyan
Message Posted at:
for everyone's suggestions
Kris.
-Original Message-
From: Lupi, Guy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 10:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help the newbie... [7:62087]
Are the links going to be connected to the same routers on both sides? If
so
nuary 29, 2003 10:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Help the newbie... [7:62087]
Are the links going to be connected to the same routers on both sides? If
so, then you can use static routes and CEF per-packet load sharing, you
would have to place 2 static routes in each router for the I
9 matches
Mail list logo
