RE: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]

2002-07-30 Thread Mark W. Odette II
o: Kelly Cobean To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 02:18:38 GMT Man, you aren't asking much, are you? ;-) Ok, here's the order I'd do things in... First things first, get that firewall in place. You don't list what their

Re: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]

2002-07-25 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
I wouldnt put dhcp on the firewall for 300 users. But for 10 or 15 I would. Thanks, -Kevin From: Gaz Reply-To: Gaz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 22:37:12 GMT What's everybody's view on using the Pix as a DHCP server? I used

RE: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]

2002-07-25 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
] Subject: Re: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] I wouldnt put dhcp on the firewall for 300 users. But for 10 or 15 I would. Thanks, -Kevin From: Gaz Reply-To: Gaz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 22:37:12 GMT What's

RE: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]

2002-07-25 Thread Juan Blanco
will be available to hackers in the Theater near You) My two cents. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin O'Gilvie Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 10:27 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] I wouldnt

Re: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]

2002-07-25 Thread Henry D.
ROTECTED] Subject: Re: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] I wouldnt put dhcp on the firewall for 300 users. But for 10 or 15 I would. Thanks, -Kevin From: Gaz Reply-To: Gaz To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002

RE: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]

2002-07-24 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
Cobean To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 02:18:38 GMT Man, you aren't asking much, are you? ;-) Ok, here's the order I'd do things in... First things first, get that firewall in place. You don't list what their internet connectivity

Re: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]

2002-07-24 Thread Gaz
y Cobean To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 02:18:38 GMT Man, you aren't asking much, are you? ;-) Ok, here's the order I'd do things in... First things first, get that firewall in place. You don't list what their internet conn

Re: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]

2002-07-24 Thread Henry D.
y Cobean Reply-To: Kelly Cobean To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 02:18:38 GMT Man, you aren't asking much, are you? ;-) Ok, here's the order I'd do things in... First things first, get that firewall in place. You

Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]

2002-07-23 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
Dear All, I am jumping into a similar mess as when I started at my current company, but this time the Macs out number the PC's. Well here is the scoop: 180 Macs 50 PC's Static Ip's No DHCP No FW Quick Mail Server and a whole bunch of other nasty things.. - They just purchases a Pix 515 - They

RE: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492]

2002-07-23 Thread Kelly Cobean
9:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Here we go again ( Pix 515) [7:49492] Dear All, I am jumping into a similar mess as when I started at my current company, but this time the Macs out number the PC's. Well here is the scoop: 180 Macs 50 PC's Static Ip's No DHCP No FW Quick Mail Server