Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

> Who AMI to argue? > > (Ouch twice) Anyone else think that its sad that we find this funny :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29704&t=29545 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com

Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

Who AMI to argue? (Ouch twice) ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >Stay well clear Howard - Most of them are HDB3 positive. (ouch) > > > >Gaz > > Doesn't B8ZS give cross-immunity? > > > > > > >""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message > >[EM

Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

>Stay well clear Howard - Most of them are HDB3 positive. (ouch) > >Gaz Doesn't B8ZS give cross-immunity? > > >""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> >Difference is, in Manchester, you still see plenty of modems around. >> > >> >Gaz >> >> >>

Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

Stay well clear Howard - Most of them are HDB3 positive. (ouch) Gaz ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >Difference is, in Manchester, you still see plenty of modems around. > > > >Gaz > > > Perhaps I am only now getting a true insight into M

Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

>Difference is, in Manchester, you still see plenty of modems around. > >Gaz Perhaps I am only now getting a true insight into Manchester encoding. > >""Ole Drews Jensen"" wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >> This reminds me of a joke: >> >> How can you compare a

Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

We feel yore pain ...but maybe the title of your post should be changed to "I Hate Vendors Who Are Too Damn Lazy To Fix a Stupid Flaw That's Probably Induced Ulcers in More Than One Engineer" 'course it loses a little punch then >>> "MADMAN" 12/18/2001 3:10:04 PM >>> Or more generally remote ac

Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

I used both XA and XB. Didn't actually mess with ISDN testing with this code but I'm reasonably sure that the customer who first reported this problem had ISDN customers, he had a PRI which generally cost more, and they worked, he was running XA. Good luck Dave Gaz wrote: > > Dave, or any

Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ~~~ > http://www.RouterChief.com > ~~~ > NEED A JOB ??? > http://www.oledrews.com/job > ~~~ > > > -Original Message- > From: Gaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, Decem

RE: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

5:36 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545] Dave, or anyone else for that matter, What image are you using for V92. We've had some problems with 12.2(2XA) that stopped multilink ISDN users from connecting. Can't find much info for V92 on cisco. Anybody any news?

Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

Dave, or anyone else for that matter, What image are you using for V92. We've had some problems with 12.2(2XA) that stopped multilink ISDN users from connecting. Can't find much info for V92 on cisco. Anybody any news? Thanks (and thanks for the info - into the saved folder), Gaz ""MADMAN""

Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

Don't count on it. They still haven't removed the collision count on show int serial after all these yeas! ;-) Priscilla At 06:10 PM 12/18/01, MADMAN wrote: >Or more generally remote access > > Thought I would pass a tid bit of info I garned after beating my head >and wasting time needles

Re: I Hate Modems [7:29545]

ohh that's sucky! >>> "MADMAN" 12/18/01 06:10PM >>> Or more generally remote access Thought I would pass a tid bit of info I garned after beating my head and wasting time needlessly in the hopes someone else doesn't replicate same. Got a call from a customer, an ISP, wondering why

I Hate Modems [7:29545]

Or more generally remote access Thought I would pass a tid bit of info I garned after beating my head and wasting time needlessly in the hopes someone else doesn't replicate same. Got a call from a customer, an ISP, wondering why his users with V.92 modems were always connecting at V.90.