here
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:10 PM
To: CCIE_Lab Groupstudy List
Subject: IP Summary-address RIP
ran into this one while digging around CCO
IP summary-address rip network mask
this command is new to IOS 12.1
it
Interesting, I guess that there is still a call out there to use RIP.
Otherwise, why would Cisco continue to make enhancements?
Good stuff to know.
Tony M.
#6172
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 8:08 PM
Subject: FW: IP Summary-address RIP [7
ought I'd post
here
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:10 PM
To: CCIE_Lab Groupstudy List
Subject: IP Summary-address RIP
ran into this one while digging around CCO
IP summary-address rip network mask
this command is
Yes, I did, that's what I don't understand. Anyone else who did the same
test and saw the result same as Doyle described in his book?
J
- Original Message -
From: "EA Louie"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRP: questions on "ip summary
t: Sunday, May 06, 2001 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRP: questions on "ip summary-address" command [7:3335]
> No, here is not the problem on auto-summary, remember the ip
summary-route
> command has a supernet address, 192.168.0.0/16, so disabled auto-summary
or
> not doesn't ma
No, here is not the problem on auto-summary, remember the ip summary-route
command has a supernet address, 192.168.0.0/16, so disabled auto-summary or
not doesn't matter, it will always be suppressed.
The point I want to clear is whether ip summary-address will suppress only
external
uot;
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRP: questions on "ip summary-address" command [7:3335]
> make sure you redistributed ospf 1 into eigrp 1, and eigrp 1 into eigrp 2
on
> Robinson.
>
> Also, do a clear ip route * and clear arp on Robinson and Snider
of 192.168.4.0 subnetted with the /29 and /30 subnets instead of the
summary that he shows in the illustration.
-e-
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Smith"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2001 3:12 PM
Subject: Re: EIGRP: questions on "ip summary-address" command [7:333
net)
That's my point, see the config at the bottom of p725:
interface serial1
ip address 172.16.2.21 255.255.255.252
ip summary-address eigrp 2 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
My understanding is 192.168.4.0/24 will be supressed by this summay address
when sent out from s1, Snider doesn't s
le (hint: make sure your summary
address didn't include that subnet)
-e-
- Original Message -
From: "Jerry Seven"
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 6:37 PM
Subject: EIGRP: questions on "ip summary-address" command [7:3335]
> Hi group,
>
> I'm
e on redistribute eigrp route to igrp domain, why the command can
also
> be used, for we want to send the summary route to igrp but not eigrp
> process.
>
> Another question is in p726, the second paragraph from bottom says that ip
> summary-address only filter external routes, I reprod
ribute eigrp route to igrp domain, why the command can
also
> be used, for we want to send the summary route to igrp but not eigrp
> process.
>
> Another question is in p726, the second paragraph from bottom says that ip
> summary-address only filter external routes, I reproduced th
p but not eigrp
process.
Another question is in p726, the second paragraph from bottom says that ip
summary-address only filter external routes, I reproduced this case study in
my home lab, but on Snider I don't see 192.168.4.0, my IOS version are all
12.0.
Any ideas?
Than
The address "classes" have been absolete for about 5 years. Don't think
of addresses in terms of Class A, B, and C's, think of them as CIDR
blocks. When someone says a "class C" they probably just mean a /24, same
with a B (/16).
For example my company commonly refers to the "Class B" we've b
PROTECTED]
---
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Edward Solomon wrote:
* Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 13:25:59 -0400
* From: Edward Solomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
* Subject: Re: IP Summary
*
* >
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Edward Solomon wrote:
> > > How many class C addresses can be summarized with 172.92.172.20/20?
> > >
> > > Is 16 the correct answers? Because there's 4 bit's left for host
> addresses?
> > > 2 powered by 4 is 16.
> > >
> > > Can one of you confirm this.
>
> 172.92.172.20 is
> > > How many class C addresses can be summarized with 172.92.172.20/20?
> > >
> > > Is 16 the correct answers? Because there's 4 bit's left for host
>addresses?
> > > 2 powered by 4 is 16.
> > >
> > > Can one of you confirm this.
>
>172.92.172.20 is a Class B address. How can you summaris
> > How many class C addresses can be summarized with 172.92.172.20/20?
> >
> > Is 16 the correct answers? Because there's 4 bit's left for host
addresses?
> > 2 powered by 4 is 16.
> >
> > Can one of you confirm this.
> 172.92.172.20 is a Class B address. How can you summarise a Class C
> addres
> > How many class C addresses can be summarized with 172.92.172.20/20?
> >
> > Is 16 the correct answers? Because there's 4 bit's left for host
addresses?
> > 2 powered by 4 is 16.
> >
> > Can one of you confirm this.
172.92.172.20 is a Class B address. How can you summarise a Class C
addresses
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Gert Jan wrote:
> All,
>
> How many class C addresses can be summarized with 172.92.172.20/20?
>
> Is 16 the correct answers? Because there's 4 bit's left for host addresses?
> 2 powered by 4 is 16.
>
> Can one of you confirm this.
>
/24 1
/23 2
/22 4
/21
.255.240.0 fastEthernet 0
Router(config)#
John Swartz
ccie, ccnp, ccdp, mcse+i, mcsd, cne
Boson Software and Training
KRANG Router Simulator at http://www.routeru.com
- Original Message -
From: ""Gert Jan"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
Sent: Thursda
All,
How many class C addresses can be summarized with 172.92.172.20/20?
Is 16 the correct answers? Because there's 4 bit's left for host addresses?
2 powered by 4 is 16.
Can one of you confirm this.
Thanks a lot.
Cheers,
Peter
___
UPDATED Posting Guidelines:
22 matches
Mail list logo
