Re: IRB Question [7:30574]

sure. But really, the whole point of IRB is to make is POSSIBLE to bridge and route the same prtotocls over the same interfaces. This doesn't mean that you WANT to or HAVE to. Shame on me for not having my Caslow handy, but perhaps the scenario requires IPX bridging only? Come to think of it, br

Re: IRB Question [7:30574]

Yes if you don't add the route statement it won't work, (route). Dave Hunt Lee wrote: > > I'm a bit confused on the the following IRB commands: > > In Caslow (p612), it gives the following IRB config example: > > (Config)# bridge irb > (Config)# interface bvi 1 > (Config)# bridge 1 bridge ip

IRB Question [7:30574]

I'm a bit confused on the the following IRB commands: In Caslow (p612), it gives the following IRB config example: (Config)# bridge irb (Config)# interface bvi 1 (Config)# bridge 1 bridge ipx But I thought the whole purpose of BVI is to route packets from the Bridge group to the BVI itself, and