Dear All,
Need your advice on the following scenario:
I am using VLANs to provide the partitons for the traffic (voice and data)
from various departments. In order to provide routing between various
VLANs, I would need a router to do so.
Please advice if there are any difference in the functiona
wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Dear All,
>
> Need your advice on the following scenario:
>
> I am using VLANs to provide the partitons for the traffic (voice and data)
> from various departments. In order to provide routing between various
> VLANs, I would need a ro
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: L3 Switching & Swtich/Router Comparsion [7:62166]
Dear All,
Need your advice on the following scenario:
I am using VLANs to provide the partitons for the traffic (voice and data)
from var
: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: L3 Switching & Swtich/Router Comparsion [7:62166]
Dear All,
Need your advice on the following scenario:
I am using VLANs to provide the partitons for the traffic (voice and data)
from various departments. In order to provide rou
I'd be careful here. Wouldn't this only be the case (that you would route
once, switch many) if you configure MLS on the both the switch and router?
i.e. it's possible to have a switch trunk it's vlans to an external router,
but without MLS, your router would still process *all* packets crossing
> 1) define "functionality"
>
> 2) define "difference"
>
> in either case, the net result is the same. for inter-vlan
> forwarding on the
> same box, the integrated L3 switch will be faster because a)
> electrons don't
> have to travel as far and b) the stripping and rewriting of L2
> headers can
The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The cable is probaby
very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across it is not a
consideration. They travel at about 2/3 the speed of light.
Priscilla
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>
> wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news
where did the other 1/3 of the speed go ?
:)
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
Cisco Systems
> The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The
cable is probaby
> very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across
it is not a
> consideration. They travel at about 2/3 the speed o
Larry Letterman wrote:
>
> where did the other 1/3 of the speed go ?
> :)
>
>
> Larry Letterman
> Network Engineer
> Cisco Systems
>
>
Scenic overlooks, bathroom breaks, and whatnot. There isn't much worth
stopping off for in "the vacuum of space." It's kinda like the eastern half
of my sta
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The cable is
probaby
> very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across it is not a
> consideration. They travel at about 2/3 the speed of light
Hmmm, IOS imgaes that are approaching, (in some cases exceeding) 20M ;)
Dave
Larry Letterman wrote:
> where did the other 1/3 of the speed go ?
> :)
>
>
> Larry Letterman
> Network Engineer
> Cisco Systems
>
>
>
>>The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The
>
> cable is p
""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> where did the other 1/3 of the speed go ?
> :)
consider your relative speed running from building to building on the Cisco
campus a) under current conditions, b) if there were no asphalt, but only
soft mud, or c)
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hmmm, IOS imgaes that are approaching, (in some cases exceeding) 20M ;)
speaking of which, how big would the same IOS image be without Banyan,
DecNet, Apollo, and all the other obsolete garbage that contaminates them
now?
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>
> ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in
> message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The
> cable is
> probaby
> > very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across it
> is not a
> > cons
""The Long and Winding Road"" wrote in
message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""MADMAN"" wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > Hmmm, IOS imgaes that are approaching, (in some cases exceeding) 20M ;)
>
> speaking of which, how big would the same IOS i
In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
> speaking of which, how big would the same IOS image be without Banyan,
> DecNet, Apollo, and all the other obsolete garbage that contaminates them
> now?
A bunch of stuff got purged in 12.2(13)T. The images not much of a reduction
in size though, new fea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kaj J. Niemi) wrote:
>
> In mail.net.groupstudy.pro, you wrote:
> > speaking of which, how big would the same IOS image be
> without Banyan,
> > DecNet, Apollo, and all the other obsolete garbage that
> contaminates them
> > now?
>
> A bunch of stuff got purged in 12.2(13)T.
The Long and Winding Road wrote:
>
> ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in
> message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > The router is probably in the same rack as the switch. The
> cable is
> probaby
> > very short. The fact that electrons have to travel across it
> is not a
> > cons
Oops. The last one was a Null Post. I meant to hit the Quote button and hit
the Post button instead.
I do have a few comments, though, of course. :-) See below.
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> The Long and Winding Road wrote:
> >
> > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in
> > message
> > [EMAIL P
MADMAN wrote:
>
> Hmmm, IOS imgaes that are approaching, (in some cases
> exceeding) 20M ;)
I'm not sure what your point it, other than to be funny :-), but I do have
to say that it doesn't matter that it's a 20 MB file when talking about the
file travelling across a fraction of an inch within a
(combining two of Priscilla's posts)
At 10:52 PM + 1/30/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>MADMAN wrote:
>>
>> Hmmm, IOS imgaes that are approaching, (in some cases
>> exceeding) 20M ;)
>
>I'm not sure what your point it, other than to be funny :-), but I do have
>to say that it doesn't mat
21 matches
Mail list logo
